Strokermjcomanche Posted October 18, 2015 Share Posted October 18, 2015 http://m.ebay.com/itm/Jeep-Cherokee-Sport-Sport-Utility-4-Door-/131626242355?nav=SEARCH Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete M Posted October 18, 2015 Share Posted October 18, 2015 neat! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strokermjcomanche Posted October 18, 2015 Author Share Posted October 18, 2015 If I did a cheromanche this would be it , although I don't know what would happen with a lot of weight in the "bed". It's not anyone's on here is it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1992EliminatorSWB4x4 Posted October 18, 2015 Share Posted October 18, 2015 Oh boy "O" Boy that shorty is Sweet. It's done right. Just Awesome and Cool l!!!. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
87Warrior Posted October 18, 2015 Share Posted October 18, 2015 Holy smoke. Somebody spent a lot of time on that! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HOrnbrod Posted October 18, 2015 Share Posted October 18, 2015 $11,500 only. http://www.hillcityhotrods.com/windowsticker.php?vehicle=788160&1996%20JEEP%20CHEROKEE%20GREY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ComancheKid45 Posted October 18, 2015 Share Posted October 18, 2015 Idk if ida put the Comanche badging on it but overall I really like it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Automan2164 Posted October 18, 2015 Share Posted October 18, 2015 Had me until the interior shots. Looks half cocked. Color isn't right on the mini console, the roundish Dakota seats look out of place in the square '96 interior. I would have liked to see either a nice MJ bench, or some first gen leather buckets. Rob Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crash Posted October 18, 2015 Share Posted October 18, 2015 The interior is definitely mediocre. Exterior looks clean. The possibilities of what my MJ would look like for that kind of money. Haha. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minuit Posted October 18, 2015 Share Posted October 18, 2015 It's very pretty on the outside (the interior bugs me in the same way Rob said - curves and the old school interior do not mix.) but I'm not sure what the benefit over a regular old MJ is. It looks like an XJ-sized MJ - not that much shorter or more maneuverable. Also what's the deal with the "trough" at the front of the bed? It looks like it's about the size of a toolbox. Does look cool though, but I still can't figure out if I like the Wagoneer front clip on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ComancheKid45 Posted October 19, 2015 Share Posted October 19, 2015 It's very pretty on the outside (the interior bugs me in the same way Rob said - curves and the old school interior do not mix.) but I'm not sure what the benefit over a regular old MJ is. It looks like an XJ-sized MJ - not that much shorter or more maneuverable. Also what's the deal with the "trough" at the front of the bed? It looks like it's about the size of a toolbox. Does look cool though, but I still can't figure out if I like the Wagoneer front clip on it. This started as a two door XJ. That trough is where the rear seat folded down ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Automan2164 Posted October 19, 2015 Share Posted October 19, 2015 It's very pretty on the outside (the interior bugs me in the same way Rob said - curves and the old school interior do not mix.) but I'm not sure what the benefit over a regular old MJ is. It looks like an XJ-sized MJ - not that much shorter or more maneuverable. Also what's the deal with the "trough" at the front of the bed? It looks like it's about the size of a toolbox. Does look cool though, but I still can't figure out if I like the Wagoneer front clip on it. This started as a two door XJ. That trough is where the rear seat folded down ;) 4 door. Look at the short doors. Nicely done, but I would want to crawl all over it. I guess I would also have to ask... why? Rob Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kook911 Posted October 19, 2015 Share Posted October 19, 2015 Forgot I had these pictures. Here is a different way to do it I guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
relyt120 Posted October 19, 2015 Share Posted October 19, 2015 It looks really nice from the front but I'm not a fan overall. Would much rather see a real Comanche done up the way the exterior of this one looks. One thing that bugs me is that they say its a show truck but the engine isn't even cleaned up for the pictures. :hmm: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zebvance Posted October 19, 2015 Share Posted October 19, 2015 2 words..... BUT WHY? why not just get a real comanche and restore it..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
91Pioneer Posted October 19, 2015 Share Posted October 19, 2015 I like it. The top one in the thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete M Posted October 19, 2015 Share Posted October 19, 2015 2 words..... BUT WHY? why not just get a real comanche and restore it..... maybe he had a partially wrecked MJ and partially wrecked XJ and was bored one day. :dunno: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ComancheKid45 Posted October 19, 2015 Share Posted October 19, 2015 It's very pretty on the outside (the interior bugs me in the same way Rob said - curves and the old school interior do not mix.) but I'm not sure what the benefit over a regular old MJ is. It looks like an XJ-sized MJ - not that much shorter or more maneuverable. Also what's the deal with the "trough" at the front of the bed? It looks like it's about the size of a toolbox. Does look cool though, but I still can't figure out if I like the Wagoneer front clip on it. This started as a two door XJ. That trough is where the rear seat folded down ;) 4 door. Look at the short doors. Nicely done, but I would want to crawl all over it. I guess I would also have to ask... why? Rob Yep 4 Dr for sure....my bad. Lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yellaheep Posted October 19, 2015 Share Posted October 19, 2015 Man, there's a TON of fab work in the bed. Look at the fender wells...... MJ bed sides and wells, grafted to the XJ wells and floor. NUTS. I'd hate to flex that on a trail...... I foresee lots of cracked filler and wavy rear body panels where the bed meets the cab. I do like the levity........ "Super-Short". :thumbsup: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ComancheFan1991 Posted October 21, 2015 Share Posted October 21, 2015 The "troughs" are the foot wells from the rear seat. I would've put a hinged lid over those, like the compartment in the back of the Honda Ridgeline. I knew those seats came out of a Dodge, but I didn't know if it was a Dakota, or a Ram. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ComancheFan1991 Posted October 21, 2015 Share Posted October 21, 2015 Man, there's a TON of fab work in the bed. Look at the fender wells...... MJ bed sides and wells, grafted to the XJ wells and floor. NUTS. I'd hate to flex that on a trail...... I foresee lots of cracked filler and wavy rear body panels where the bed meets the cab. I do like the levity........ "Super-Short". :thumbsup: I wonder if it flexes normally, or if they beefed up the uniframe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spectormj Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 The thing that bugs me is how they say its a Comanche the cab line doesn't work as a bed line.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogmorgo Posted October 28, 2015 Share Posted October 28, 2015 Not sure what you mean. I agree, they shouldn't be calling it a Comanche because it isn't one, but all the body lines look like they match what they would on an MJ. It just looks weird because the bed is so much shorter and there's no gap between the cab and bed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HOrnbrod Posted October 29, 2015 Share Posted October 29, 2015 Not sure what you mean. I agree, they shouldn't be calling it a Comanche because it isn't one, but all the body lines look like they match what they would on an MJ. It just looks weird because the bed is so much shorter and there's no gap between the cab and bed. Call it a Jeep El Camino. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogmorgo Posted October 30, 2015 Share Posted October 30, 2015 I like Cheromanche better. :thumbsup: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now