DirtyComanche

That's a bummer, but that adapter plate sure came out nice anyways. :thumbsup:

Tcase linkage is a total WTF. Which lead to more WTFs about how this truck has been put together... So I'm going to have to build one from scratch. Yay! But that's a project for another day. Anyways, onwards. Out with the blow'd up D35! Image Not Found And the crusty turd of an XJ D44 getting prepped to go in: Image Not Found Honestly, I didn't get much done today. Lots more swearing than usual. Oh well. Anyone know how thick the wall of the XJ D44 tubes are? 1/4"?

IAT values are in this table: http://comancheclub.com/topic/49753-found-replacement-air-charge-temperature-sensor-or-iat/page-2?hl=iat&do=findComment&comment=513136 I'd be more concerned if it's erratic or doing weird things. You can pull it out and clean it and then test it in water on the stove. I'll have to look in the manual for the MAP stuff, but there's a few threads on here about it too. Again, I'd be more concerned that it's doing erratic things.

Is it actually stuck in 4wd, or is the indicator light just on because the vacuum switch is screwed or the CAD won't disengage? Smoke from the dip stick ain't good. Make sure it's not overfilled with oil, then compression check and go from there... The engine is probably less than healthy.

Can you define what your goal is here? The D30 front is okay and will hold up got most mild usage and 33-34" tires. The JK variant seems to be able to handle 35" tires and a fair amount of abuse with a few upgrades, and lots of guys are running around with 37" tires on them. Swapping to a totally different front axle involves a fair amount of fab work or an expensive (and not ideal) bracket kit (plus still a bunch of work to remove other brackets and weld it on). For every 10 'built' Jeeps you see, only one has something other than the stock (or other basically bolt in Jeep variant) front axle. It's just a lot of work and expense. I've got a Ford D60 (out of a 94 F-350) in the front of my XJ, and I have a lot more money and time into that than I would ever care to admit.

Check the MAP and the IAT, And I hope you've cleaned your grounds and replaced the stupid bonding braid. Otherwise you're going to need to diagnose it when it isn't running.

Only the rear. They're IFS garbage in the front. If you want to swap both axles it becomes much more involved and there winds up being many more options as you don't need to match the width or bolt pattern.

The 8.8 out of the Explorer is a bit narrower, 58.5" vs 60" sort of thing. Depending what wheels you run you might want a set of spacers, the front axle is wider than the rear anyways (61") so you can run a set of 1.25" spacers and it winds up bang on with the front. Later Explorer axles (94+ IIRC) are disk brake.

The Ford 8.8 is quite common, along with the later Chrysler 8.25 out of the XJ, and the XJ/MJ D44 is also a good choice but they're harder to find. Or if you're willing to pay you can have something built by any of the axle shops (Currie, Strange, Dynatrac).

It's handy for advanced troubleshooting providing you know what to do with it. IE, with an alternator you could diagnose if it has a bad diode, or if there is damage to the windings, simply based on how the ripple DC output looks. Or you can see if a crank, cam, speed, etc sensor is produce a good output, providing you have a known comparison. Or you could look at injector firing in regards to timing and duration. Older vehicles they tend to be less useful on, but on a newer stuff somebody who knows what they're doing with it can solve many problems that would make others (including high end shops and dealers) give up. Something as simple as an alternator with ugly output can actually cause all sorts of phantom issues, everything from misfires to CELs without a code, on a newer vehicle. A Renix is naturally pretty much hardened against this, along with an OBD-I HO setup, so the applicability in that regards to a MJ is minimal. Also, you can see other electrical noise and potentially narrow it down and eliminate it. Bad shielding and suspect grounds can cause all sorts of mysteries on unrelated circuits. In the analog world it is something that audiophiles tend to understand, but in the modern digital world it could affect almost any system. Like I said, I'd love to have one around to play with, there is a lot of times when things happen that 'don't make sense' where some time with a silly-scope could probably shed some light.

I made an AX-15 mount out of an AW4 mount, because I didn't have an AX-15 mount here. Not super pretty... Probably should have just gone to the junkyard. Image Not Found But now at least I can get the trans and tcase positioned correctly so I can measure for rear pinion angle, well, assumed rear pinion angle, but less of a guess than before. Also found that my tcase shifter linkage is binding on everything and totally wrong. I will have to dig through the stuff removed from The Blue Pill and see if I saved that crap and if it can be used on a AX-15. And I've decided I will be lazy and split the tcase under the truck to do the SYE. Or at least that's my plan right now.

Yes, it will, it doesn't know any better. Likewise, you can drop a HEI in a Renix and leave it to only control the injectors. Edit, the timing curve will be way less than ideal. At the very least get a high altitude CPS or mod the one you have.

Pretty much. But now if anyone searches for a group 34 swap they should find this thread and conclude that as long as you actually have a group 34 battery that it will bolt in. I'm still confused about the other battery I have. Whatever, it will probably fit in the plow truck when the battery in it gets toasted or frozen.

Being CS-130 internals you can rewind them for upwards of 200A, more if you're ballsy. I wouldn't go anywhere near that, and personally feel even the 'stockish' 100A is plenty fine for most uses. A 130-150A rewind is probably a reasonable number to shoot for as it should be plenty without pushing things. A manual high idle feature (IE, a pull cable) will do you way more favours than rewinding the alternator, as you need about 1900RPM (engine speed) to get rated output from the 100A alternator, and the alternator needs speed in order to stay cool anyways.

Soooo, to finish this off. A group 34 is a direct bolt in. Your hold down will fit fine, the cables reach, etc, etc. Good upgrade if your battery dies since they're more common than the 58 anyways. The '34R' battery I had isn't even the same size as a normal 34, so I have no idea what it is, it actually looks like it has the wrong label on it. :rotf: I bought a new 34 today and it bolted in with zero issues.

Damn, that's a lot of bodywork, but it looks like it has paid off!

All the hold down bolts I've looked at have been the same length, 1987-2001. Odd. I'm not sure what's up then. Now that you mention it, I'm rather certain I used a stock hold down for the group 34 in my XJ and it was plenty long. I'm guessing I've got more random parts. I'll have to look in the shed and see what I have.

I'll pick up the right battery next time I go into town. I might look for the HO hold downs the next time I hit the wrecker, the Renix ones aren't long enough. Modding them isn't hard, but why waste the time when the rest of the truck isn't together anyways.

The Renix isn't actually a 1 wire setup, not that it really matters since it isn't doing anything more than a 1 wire. You can wire a Renix alt to function as a 1 wire, and a 1 wire would function the same in a Renix. That alternator is the same mount pattern BUT it won't technically bolt in since the small ear is threaded for oh, I dunno, some sort of M8 thread probably. The Renix one is just an 8mm straight hole and the bracket is threaded. You can just blow the threads out of that alternator with a drill bit if you want to though. Also, the housing on the back might be clocked differently. Typically GM alternators are something like 180* out of what the Renix one is. This should not matter as the Renix brackets do not pick up on the rear mount hole anyways. Cliff notes is it will fit and work but it might be a bit of screwing around.

Sometimes the shuttle valve in the distribution block will shuttle one way or another and then fail to reset when you go to bleed it. Smack it with a screwdriver handle and see if it helps.

Does this school have a name? I'm all for buying random junk because I can. :rotf:

You've made a ton more progress since I last checked this. :thumbsup:

Sorry, I always assume everyone uses the 4.0L and forget the 2.5L exists. I should have specified it is a 4.0L application. Strokermjcomanche wins the cookie, this is a 34R battery. Conveniently the label does not indicate this, but comparing it to the 'exact' same battery in my JK and the posts are backwards. This is extremely annoying as I was hoping to use this battery since I already had it (came with a truck I bought), and it is the same the one in my JK and XJ (XJ has a totally different tray/battery location and stretched fenders, so I could not use it to compare to the MJ) other than the posts are reversed and it isn't going to fit any of the vehicles I own. Yay! I guess I better go buy another battery with my Cambodian Tire money.

Looking at random interweb pictures leads me to believe that the later tray probably moves the battery towards the engine a bit, thus getting a little extra room for the posts. That said, I'm not sure.

Clean everything up and chase it down. Start with the easy stuff.