-
Posts
7938 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
11
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Everything posted by DirtyComanche
-
The EGR is of little use, IMHO, and was not included on later models... There isn't much running it anyways, just a line from the manifold to the solenoid, and a line from the solenoid to the valve. Either way it's junk under the hood. Yes, my MJ still has it, but it's long gone on my XJ (which is running a HO intake and exhaust). The intake air preheater setup is also of little use. I live in a rather cold climate, and I turfed it on both my MJ and XJ. No noticeable difference in cold starts. That's what another one of those lines is for.
-
Sooo... Some things I observed. -These tires suck for this, and running studded tires is about to become a no-no anyways. I need some decent mud terrains or something like that, 265/70R17 or 235/80R17 probably -The air line for the rear locker is leaking, durr -My front tow hooks are garbage because they don't have keepers, so at least I will have to track down some keepers -My rear bumper still looks like crap, and the hitch is seized in (not handy) -Most of the canopy clamps fell off on the washboard -My clutch won't disengage, ordered a new master and line for it to try before ordering a clutch... Hasn't shown up, so I can't determine if I need to order a whole clutch or not at this point. -Really need to get off my @$$ and build up and swap out the upper control arms, and a bad motor mount, both are super noticeable on the washboard
-
I went for a little drive today... Just off the highway on Willow North: It varied from being solid (as pictured) to seriously sloppy and wet. I left the rear unlocked in hope that if I buried it I'd be able to back out. Turned out there wasn't anything too terrible and walked through all of it. Ran into some dude doing a little gold prospecting on the way. Grey day, but the willow is moving some water: Went to St Marie, then figured I'd pop over to Opatcho, this is the little lake along the way to Opatcho. Not sure what it's actually called, Otipemisiwak? It was easy to get into. Flexing out on a stump at Opatcho. Rawr! : :) Opatcho was a little sloppy to get into, but certainly didn't need or use the rear locker. I then figured I'd try to go to Narrow, because that's a more interesting way to get home. I turned off into Ispah on the way, but it was probably not going to end well with 32" snow tires. If there was another vehicle I would have gone for it though, was mostly worried I'd get down to it and not be able to get turned around and enough momentum to get back up. Just before Pitoney the road deteriorated badly. And then I ran into this guy... He was screwed. Nothing with him, was using a broken piece of a pallet to try to dig himself out. When I took the picture I had actually dragged him a bunch already, and there was some grade there, and just that crappy wet slushy snow. I got to the point I couldn't maneuver well, plus my towhooks suck for tugging, so I resorted to digging him out with a shovel and using a comealong to drag him back to me. I turned around after I got him out, I felt like I could probably make it farther, but likely I would get in trouble and be unable to get through Narrow to the Bowrun FSR. Stopped and took another picture at the bridge over the Willow:
-
Krustyballer's hitch is designed basically the same as the other ones that used to be commercially available. They don't have gussets because there is no space for them, and they aren't terribly rigid until bolted to the frame. At work we use expanding foam to pack odd shaped items. Basically wrap the item in plastic, throw it in a box, add foam around it until it takes up the void space. Okay, there's a little more to it, but it's costly, so not a great option. I'd add some strategic pieces of wood to them and wedge them into a box. If it can't move around in the box, and the mount ends are blocked so they won't punch through the sides of the box, I don't see it causing any issues.
-
Project black n mild
DirtyComanche replied to dellstopjeep's topic in Member Projects: Your Comanches
Looks good with some lift. :thumbsup: -
All 91-95 HO map sensors are firewall mounted and can be used on a Renix. The 96 only MAP is TB mounted but has the same outputs and the earlier MAPs. The 97's and up MAPs are all TB mounted and have different outputs than the earlier MAPS. Okay, thanks for the correction, I thought all the TB mounted ones were the same. Silly for them to change them.
-
Which 4.0 is preferred for a swap?
DirtyComanche replied to Jtrux's topic in MJ Tech: Modification and Repairs
The Edlebrock head doesn't flow any better than a ported stock H.O.head according to posts on the Jeepstrokers site. Or even as well as the old HESCO aluminum head.(I have one in my stash of old parts). I would have said the Hesco head, but they're not exactly available. IMHO the head is worth it for the heat dissipation and detonation avoidance. But once the 300HP number is thrown out there, there isn't a cheap way to do it. Save that he could just file the ring gap right out, buy a progressive nitrous kit, and spray n' pray... -
AW4 hinky reverse issue
DirtyComanche replied to NC Tom's topic in MJ Tech: Modification and Repairs
It's really only a full rebuild if you open it up, for the time it takes to get that far replacing all the wear parts is only what makes sense. The rebuild kit isn't terribly costly from what I recall, but people want an arm and a leg to do it. http://www.rockauto.com/en/moreinfo.php?pk=4723188&cc=1181720&jsn=375 Not sure if there's better kits out there or not. That one is listed for an A340, but it shooooooooooould be correct. -
Chirp Chirp Chirp . . .
DirtyComanche replied to 90 work truck's topic in MJ Tech: Modification and Repairs
Picture of the new pulley setup vs old? -
Which 4.0 is preferred for a swap?
DirtyComanche replied to Jtrux's topic in MJ Tech: Modification and Repairs
IMHO, you'll want the Edlebrock head. I'd get a later block for convenience. I'd run the coil pack ignition. No idea how achievable 300HP is N/A, probably not easy short of building a big stroker and I'm not sure what reliability is going to be like... -
Early HO and Renix ones are the same. Along with GM TBI applications. The later HO ones are different in how they mount (directly to the throttle body) but still have the same logic/output. I'm not Mopar-or-Nocar, so I'd get an ACDelco one... Pretty certain the brand new spare I have on the shelf is ACDelco.
-
Which 4.0 is preferred for a swap?
DirtyComanche replied to Jtrux's topic in MJ Tech: Modification and Repairs
What's the goals of the engine? Boost? Big power? -
The Renix intake fits the HO head better than the HO intake fits the Renix head... Neither is optimal. The Renix exhaust header fits the HO head fine, or it should, as you can get a stock HO header to fit on a Renix head with no issues. The exhaust ports are in the same location. I'd get the later HO intake and adapt the Renix controls to it. Should be good for a few ponies, between giving you a large throttle body and better flowing intake manifold.
-
Dual Batteries Under the Hood
DirtyComanche replied to Dzimm's topic in MJ Tech: DIY Projects and Write-Ups
This is a good idea but I plan on having A/C and it has cruise so along with the overflow bottle and fuse box there really isn't space there. I understand. I don't have A/C. None of my wiring is anywhere near where the factory put it (plus that's a Renix), and my overflow bottle is actually where the factory should have put it (on the driver's side). I doubt you could get my tray to work with A/C though, to say it is tight is an understatement. -
Dual Batteries Under the Hood
DirtyComanche replied to Dzimm's topic in MJ Tech: DIY Projects and Write-Ups
I'd put it where the coolant reservoir is on a Renix instead. Image Not Found Image Not Found This is a single battery setup, but you get the point... It's void space, might as well fill it, and it's on the correct side for shorter cables. -
Renix aftermarket header
DirtyComanche replied to Knucklehead97's topic in MJ Tech: Modification and Repairs
I just used a grinder to grind down the intake manifold enough to fit. And as I said before, that won't fix an issue with the tubes fouling on the intake runners. The Renix intake has the runners much lower on it than either of the HO style intakes. If the header tubes have too gentle of a radius out of the exhaust ports they will hit the intake runners, and a grinder isn't going to fix that (not in a way that works). A stock HO header, no big deal, do a little clearance work on the flanges if need be. But why run a stock header? You're referring to the late late models with the swooped up intake manifolds that take that header. Correct. That won't work. But. get one for a 91 to 96 and you're fine. The header I just posted will fit an early HO intake (or later, would fit the later one better) but can't possibly fit a Renix intake. -
Renix aftermarket header
DirtyComanche replied to Knucklehead97's topic in MJ Tech: Modification and Repairs
I haven't, but it's been done. Same problems apply as with the earlier HO intake, plus the usual problems for going to that intake. I don't know if it's a terribly worthwhile mod without reworking the intake ports on the head or going to a HO head (would be the route I would go if it came up). -
Renix aftermarket header
DirtyComanche replied to Knucklehead97's topic in MJ Tech: Modification and Repairs
I built my own downpipe. 2.5" cheap 409 stainless. Image Not Found Image Not Found I never took a picture of it installed for whatever reason, but it's very tight, and that's with running an axle that offsets the pinion about 2" farther left than stock... -
Renix aftermarket header
DirtyComanche replied to Knucklehead97's topic in MJ Tech: Modification and Repairs
I just used a grinder to grind down the intake manifold enough to fit. And as I said before, that won't fix an issue with the tubes fouling on the intake runners. The Renix intake has the runners much lower on it than either of the HO style intakes. If the header tubes have too gentle of a radius out of the exhaust ports they will hit the intake runners, and a grinder isn't going to fix that (not in a way that works). A stock HO header, no big deal, do a little clearance work on the flanges if need be. But why run a stock header? -
Renix aftermarket header
DirtyComanche replied to Knucklehead97's topic in MJ Tech: Modification and Repairs
easy to address. I have photos. I meant certain aftermarket ones. The tubes foul on the intake runners. -
My '87 D30 outers vs. my '06 LJ D30 outers
DirtyComanche replied to Jtrux's topic in MJ Tech: Modification and Repairs
The newer knuckles are stronger. -
Renix aftermarket header
DirtyComanche replied to Knucklehead97's topic in MJ Tech: Modification and Repairs
It's an availability thing. Not all HO headers will clear the Renix intake manifold. I found that out the hard way. -
A 91 up trans still isn't a bolt in, even if you swap the tcase or the tcase input gear. They used a different TV cable on the later ones, and the actual TV itself is different. Wiring also changed some at some point. It can be made to work, but don't expect it to just be a bolt in and go. And as always, be sure you retain your Renix specific flexplate.
-
Yup, the orings will dry out if they've been sitting for a long time. Get some new ones on there, use a dab of clean oil, WD-40, or something like that to lube them on install with the new injectors. You might want to change the one on the fuel pressure regulator at the same time, it's the same oring as the injectors themselves.
-
The first ones are Ford 710 (or 700, as I found), the second are the Volvo 746. The 746 are said to be better, but nobody has a straight answer as to why. Either is an upgrade. If you're seeing smoke it likely is fuel being vapourized. It's probably just the orings that are shot, but the Renix injectors are a two-piece design and are known to split and leak. Yes, you can burn your truck down with this stuff...
