Jump to content

ejndssn

Members
  • Posts

    669
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by ejndssn

  1. if you can post it to another site that doesn't have a loggin requirement i already have to many as it is... unless there was another way the it can be broadcast on this site :cheers:
  2. well here is the latest on the front ends for these bute's http://www.chinacartimes.com/2007/02/26/get-yourself-a-jeep-2500-for-only-100000rmb/ it may be in our future at a distributor near you at least i hope so :brows:
  3. yep i get one quick. and they would be pretty on gas too
  4. there are two types of AX-15 internal slave and external i went with the external slave. and agree with Jp frogger get everything from the donor even the tranny mount. the swap is pretty good to do. :brows:
  5. thats a tuf choice :brows: my lady would shoot me if i came home with another Jeep almost had her convince about 89 YJ. thats a sweet machine
  6. Beaterjeep wrote I hope that it is of the project vice the injury... but who know some of us would have done the stiches with the other hand :brows: who need doctors anyway :cheers: they are overrated. don't let it get infected dude or you will have to see one of those overrated doctors
  7. They may have blue printed this 4.0l. are your plans for the rebuild going to be a home brew version like that of the bryce. and keep us posted on the heavy weight yes
  8. thanks for the up load whats the trick. :dunno: I do hope that the performance doc comes in handy you may already have it. should you stroke the 4.0l i recommend lite version, for others the heavy are the one of choice, this sounds like a beer commercial :cheers: (less filling /taste great). the differences is that lite is a plug and play & 4 cw . the heavy requires a trim at the snout & 12 cw.
  9. Pete first want to say sorry for the out come. Any way at the bottom of this shot you will see a CW http://www.printroom.com/ViewAlbumPhoto.asp?shopperid=NBD19WSC2EJ98KS1LP61H7T968RCERP8&userid=Lancia1&album_id=48070&image_id=1 also the Dinos site has a good picture of the AP stroker without obstructions that is a 4 CW one on each end and two in the center you stated that he was adamant that it was a stroker he could have been tooked and didnt know it and may be he's just as :mad: or in denial :???:
  10. :agree: with CW I've have 2 XJ's(89,96) and 1 MJ(89) Almost had an YJ but the wife x'nade and even with the MJ stroked just learn to live with it and monitor for any additional noise. :brows:
  11. the hats got my vote and i'll take 2 of them just let me know if camo is an option cause i may want an extra for hunting trips... as for the cozie well i loose too many of them :brows:
  12. why not drop a small v8 like the 265ci i know that some gm cars had them like the buick century :nuts: go get the cyclone 4.3l that gm produced believe that v6 had 24v and turbo charged as well :nuts:
  13. need to determine if a lifter is a suspect since they are hydraulic… this may be one of the causes that you hear after the initial start up . Try to isolate the source of the noise if its at the top of the engine or on the bottom. Leaky lifter or spun bearing could be a possibility. :cheers: and if you decide to change out the eng have it stroke you will not regret it. :cheers:
  14. ejndssn

    Comanger????

    now we need to see a dually :brows: which i have not seen yet that is very cool
  15. Update from the stroke site by Greg I was wrong in stating 8 cw for the 4.2l :oops: only the 4.0l had 8 cw and i do believe that the Dino's web site will provide additional help as well. here is an response by Dino from the stroker's site keeping my fingers crossed that there is 4 cw or 12 cw
  16. Pete look at the counter weights the 4.2L had two types if there is 12 cw then for sure it has been stroked. If there are 8cw then you will have to measure the stroke which it appears to be difficult at the moment. I was hoping that you had some time to look at the links that i have provided. The first link may be of great value to us all since its the jeep performance book. I will check with the stroker site and see what they have to offer and post my findings from the stroke site shortly
  17. sounds like Pete will be inspector gadget :wrench: on a very nice day good luck. Pete just another question do you know what type of axles gears was on the XJ prior to the surgery. :hmm: btw we are expecting to get wet down here. :jump: its about time too
  18. lookin good that will be very nice truck once your done with it. Have you decided what type of paint are you going to use. :hmm:
  19. DirtyComanche :agree: with that and there where two types one called the heavy weight which i believe is the 70's vintage crank(12cw) and the light weight was in the mid 80"s vintage crank (8cw) like that of the 4.0 and i do believe that bryce was one of the first pioneer's in this arena. here are some links that i have found that may help http://www.yankeeinfluences.com/jeep/JeepEngines.pdf http://www.jeep4.0performance.4mg.com/tech_specs.html http://www.bc4x4.com/tech/bryce/stroker/assembly.cfm I also do agree with Pete's assessment hope this helps
  20. nice catch have fun with it :cheers:
  21. its most likey not stroked :cry: unless the company that rebuilt this can provide the details for ya good luck you may want to check out dino's site and see if there is any additional information that may help there is always that chance that this person may have been lazy to have the Tab's removed.
  22. looks like the walls are pretty clean its a good deal on the engine.
  23. was it a bear to get that spare carrier down or PB the bolts to death then make the attempt :dunno: I'm leanning to the PB to death prior to attempt get at the bolts :brows:
  24. Pete did you look at the distributor and see if the retainer ear's have been removed that is a tell tail sign of a stroker. most guys on the stroker web site states that this has to be done to get it properly tuned :brows:. and of course the injectors as well are another source. i have the 5.2l from a GC and she starts very quickly.
  25. yep :agree: with that... if you happened to obtain another you can get a better gm engine than the weak 2.8 or do like another member did here on site and made the 4.0 fit into 86 eng compartment.
×
×
  • Create New...