Jump to content

non-jeep junkyard treasures to hunt for


Recommended Posts

what trucks/cars other than XJ/MJ have parts that we can use? i´m trying to make a list of such things, the one´s  have learned of

 

- Ford explorer 8.8 rear axle with disks

- Dakota with the 2.5 and AX15

- Isuzu rodeo with Vv6 and AW4

- Ford Taurus electric fans

 

any more?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Car Enthusiast said:

Does anyone use the 8.25 rear end out of a KJ? I know the perches would t work but wouldn't it be as if it was from an XJ?

Yup.  A KJ 8.25 is just as usable as one from an XJ once the spring perches are changed to accommodate MJ springs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, omega_rugal said:

i want to add the Chevrolet S10 for the steering column but some say is not a direct fit

 

and Dodge durango steering boxes...

 

Not just the S-10, all kinds of GM vehicles from the 80s - early 2000s.  If they're different at all they would still be chock-full of donor parts; like all of them except the lower housing and the steering shaft... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, AZJeff said:

Yup.  A KJ 8.25 is just as usable as one from an XJ once the spring perches are changed to accommodate MJ springs.

 

it's even better than an XJ since 03-07 have disks and are a couple inches wider which will better accommodate the MJ's wide butt :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For cheapskates like me who want to spend the smallest possible amount to replace blown MJ speakers:

 

Chevy Aveo for 4X6s

Suzuki SX-4 for 5.25"

 

If you stumble upon a Ford Ranger FX4 Level II, the Alcoa wheels are an easy sell on the Ranger forums. Same pattern as the MJ, but I tried 'em but the MJ has a bigger hub, so no-go, unless maybe with spacers? I've got some, they're forged aluminum and really light. Still with the Level II it has a 8.8 axle with LSD, but instead of the common Trac-Lok clutch type, it has a Torsen. It also has a stick-shift t-case instead of the electronic knob; again, the Ranger guys will go nuts for one of those.

 

And finally, GMC k2500 4x4 rear shocks, something like a 1990, I'll have to check. According to my research, same mounting type/hardware, and are longer which would make them perfect for a lifted MJ. Only worth it at the JY if they seem in perfect shape, because even brand new, they are CHEAP!!! IIRC, the cheapest ones on RockAuto were Gabriels for like 25$CAD each! I will try it in the next months when I'll have some money; so unconfirmed for now, but research with shock manufacturers spec charts says it should work.

 

18 hours ago, Pete M said:

 

it's even better than an XJ since 03-07 have disks and are a couple inches wider which will better accommodate the MJ's wide butt :D

Is that what causes that ugly tuck in the rear? So, the truck is like wedge shape, wider in the rear than the front? My Ranger 2WD's specs says the track width is narrower in the back than the front which causes the same effect, so I thought that was the case on a Comanche!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look for any rodeo/passport rear axle from 93+. 95+ will all have Dana 44’s. 96-97 2wd axles have 4.56 gears and are practically a bolt in for YJs aside from bolt pattern. 98+ are essentially JK axles. All years use thick cut gear sets and will have nice ratios ranging from 4.10-4.88. Most 4wd have disks and most 2wd have drums. Great little axles and easy to sell since no one seems to get that they’re all D44’s. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, OldSch88L said:

 

 

Is that what causes that ugly tuck in the rear? So, the truck is like wedge shape, wider in the rear than the front? My Ranger 2WD's specs says the track width is narrower in the back than the front which causes the same effect, so I thought that was the case on a Comanche!


Exactly. That’s why the exploder axles look very narrow on an MJ without some good size spacers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, OldSch88L said:

Is that what causes that ugly tuck in the rear? So, the truck is like wedge shape, wider in the rear than the front? My Ranger 2WD's specs says the track width is narrower in the back than the front which causes the same effect, so I thought that was the case on a Comanche!

 

we use the same axles as a Cherokee, but they don't have the same issue of the big butt. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some late model vehicles have gentex mirrors with different options. From several Subaru’s I have gotten the mirrors with homelink, auto dim, compass, and outside temp. There is a higher level model that has map lights built in as well. I’m not sure what vehicle to get that from. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...