ghetdjc320 Posted Thursday at 09:49 PM Author Share Posted Thursday at 09:49 PM So the 5th gear update difference is in the gear hub design. The new style uses different keys and springs for the synchro hub. Looks like a better design to hold it in gear better. The gear itself looks identical. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ghetdjc320 Posted Thursday at 10:06 PM Author Share Posted Thursday at 10:06 PM Transmission internals are all finished and the upgrades are in place. Very satisfying project. Really came to appreciate the way this thing is engineered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eagle_SX4 Posted Friday at 12:24 AM Share Posted Friday at 12:24 AM 2 hours ago, ghetdjc320 said: So the 5th gear update difference is in the gear hub design. The new style uses different keys and springs for the synchro hub. Looks like a better design to hold it in gear better. The gear itself looks identical. Awesome thanks for the pics. Upgrades maybe in my future, next time I open up my transmission. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ghetdjc320 Posted Friday at 03:24 AM Author Share Posted Friday at 03:24 AM Just finished up the re assembly. It shift so smoothly. Really happy with how it turned out. It’s worth noting that the synchros that come in a rebuild kit will typically give you the wrong rings for 3/4 gears. The part you need that has the “house” shaped teeth is the same as the 5th gear synchro. One could just order up a couple more 5th gears synchros to compete the kit. I ended up re-using my 3/4 synchros as they were if like new shape with almost zero wear. Evidence of the relatively low mileage on this Comanche (90k). First and second synchros were a bit more worn but everything is new now. One particular aspect to pay attention to on a transmission rebuild are the springs and keys that are inside the synchro hubs. They play a crucial role in shift performance and keeping you in gear. They aren’t difficult to assemble but are a bit finicky. Still need to finish prepping and painting the case. On to complete the engine work tomorrow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ghetdjc320 Posted yesterday at 12:40 AM Author Share Posted yesterday at 12:40 AM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comanche SS Posted yesterday at 04:07 AM Share Posted yesterday at 04:07 AM Looking good! Decide on any engine upgrades? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ghetdjc320 Posted yesterday at 06:48 AM Author Share Posted yesterday at 06:48 AM 2 hours ago, Comanche SS said: Looking good! Decide on any engine upgrades? No real mods planned. I just wanted to do all the reliability upgrades that have been developed in the last 20 years. The trunions, new lifter trays and lifters, ls2 water pump etc. I was considering running 243 heads and the ls6 cam but ultimately decided against it as the power band would have moved a bit out of my ideal range. Surprisingly, the 241 heads have considerably better exhaust flow than the 243’s and the C5 cam was made specifically for these heads. I’m trying to balance this build from an engineering perspective. Between the engine, tranny, t case, axles, brakes and steering, just trying to get everything on the same level if that makes sense. Something along the lines of what could have been a factory style build if that makes sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ghetdjc320 Posted 19 hours ago Author Share Posted 19 hours ago Ordered up some odds and ends. Crossmember with skid from stinkyfab offroad along with their upper control arm mount and track bar bracket. I wasn’t too pleased with the Barnes 4wd parts that i installed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comanche SS Posted 13 hours ago Share Posted 13 hours ago 19 hours ago, ghetdjc320 said: No real mods planned. I just wanted to do all the reliability upgrades that have been developed in the last 20 years. The trunions, new lifter trays and lifters, ls2 water pump etc. I was considering running 243 heads and the ls6 cam but ultimately decided against it as the power band would have moved a bit out of my ideal range. Surprisingly, the 241 heads have considerably better exhaust flow than the 243’s and the C5 cam was made specifically for these heads. I’m trying to balance this build from an engineering perspective. Between the engine, tranny, t case, axles, brakes and steering, just trying to get everything on the same level if that makes sense. Something along the lines of what could have been a factory style build if that makes sense. Totally makes sense....I admittedly went a little on the large side with my LS3 (stage 3 cam) in the comanche, it doesnt have much go below 3K RPM, but above 3K it is like having two engines lol The LS1 in my GTO has a stage 2 cam, and its great for a car, not that I would want it in a jeep. My Denali, has a Stage 1 cammed LS3 build, and it is great for daily driving...if I do anymore off road LS builds, itll be a stage 1 LS3 build. Maybe I missed it, are ya doing all the engine oil upgrades? New pump, o-ring, barbell, etc...? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ghetdjc320 Posted 12 hours ago Author Share Posted 12 hours ago 17 minutes ago, Comanche SS said: Totally makes sense....I admittedly went a little on the large side with my LS3 (stage 3 cam) in the comanche, it doesnt have much go below 3K RPM, but above 3K it is like having two engines lol The LS1 in my GTO has a stage 2 cam, and its great for a car, not that I would want it in a jeep. My Denali, has a Stage 1 cammed LS3 build, and it is great for daily driving...if I do anymore off road LS builds, itll be a stage 1 LS3 build. Maybe I missed it, are ya doing all the engine oil upgrades? New pump, o-ring, barbell, etc...? I had installed new o rings when I did the new pan. I am still considering doing and engine oil cooler though. Just can’t find a good place to mount the cooler. Also installed a new rear cover and gasket while I was back there but didn’t do the barbel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comanche SS Posted 11 hours ago Share Posted 11 hours ago 1 hour ago, ghetdjc320 said: I had installed new o rings when I did the new pan. I am still considering doing and engine oil cooler though. Just can’t find a good place to mount the cooler. Also installed a new rear cover and gasket while I was back there but didn’t do the barbel. This was my plan...only until I figured out the headers I have leave absolutely no room for the Oil line adapter. That, and the fact I read that oil needs be hit 212* on occasion at least to burn off any water, or other potential contaminants and it was hard to do with a big oil cooler like the one pictured. Also heard rumors about it lowering oil pressure...ended up just abandoning the idea as most LS vehicles didnt come with an oil cooler from GM to begin with... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now