Jump to content

New IAT / Intake Air Temperature Sensor


Recommended Posts

For those of you interested, Tomco of St. Louis, MO makes an Air Temperature Sensor and have for a while it seems.  http://www.tomco-inc.com/ 

 

They do have a new part number, replacing the old #12120.

 

New part number is 12134 and it runs $69.73.  They have them in stock.  Telephone:  314-646-5300

 

I read that some guys were using the 312-190, modifying with the AC Delco PT307 harness, which is quite a bit less expensive possible option.

 

Just sharing what I've been searching about today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
On 10/9/2019 at 7:17 PM, JMO413 said:

The Delco works and is quite a bit cheaper.

IMG_20190305_183245687.jpg.835521c5efabb992214a4dfd2c5194b6.jpg

Sensor, connector to the sensor, & connector end to plug into harness.

Do 4.0l and 2.5l engines have the same sensor. I ordered that one but it's too big

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, JMO413 said:

From the factory it goes directly in the intake. I saw no real difference with it in the air cleaner. The ECM does read the air temp is lower beacuse it is. The intake is not heating the sensor.

Did you install it on the upper part or the lower part of the intake box

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, JMO413 said:

It stays much cleaner than in the intake manifold.

In the intake of the 2.5..........fuel wash, whereas the 4.0 has no fuel wash. 

 

Also, the 2.5 has a heated intake whereas the 4.0 does not. Considerable difference in air temps. 

 

 

 

Just pointing that out. 

Everyone here keeps comparing the apples to the oranges.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jeep Driver said:

In the intake of the 2.5..........fuel wash, whereas the 4.0 has no fuel wash. 

 

Also, the 2.5 has a heated intake whereas the 4.0 does not. Considerable difference in air temps. 

 

 

 

Just pointing that out. 

Everyone here keeps comparing the apples to the oranges.

You are correct. I know nothing about the 2.5. There 4.0 on the other hand I have had a few of. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The perfect place is where engineering put it. Keep in mind any location hotter or colder, fuel trim will compensate for because O2S is boss and 14.7:1 will be maintained. Unless location is so hot or so cold ECU may default to OPEN LOOP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 years later...
On 12/29/2019 at 5:14 PM, JMO413 said:

Not for sure. I actually mounted mine in the air box.

 

26 minutes ago, Salvagedcircuit said:

Has anyone discovered improvements with moving the Intake AIr Temperature sensor to the air box?

This is an old article about it claiming 1-1.5mpg gains:

 

https://markism.net/jeep_IAT_relocate.html

 

I'm curious if anyone has had success doing this. Maybe I'll make a new thread about it.

Thanks!

JMO, did you see any fuel economy gains?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was debating putting a threaded brass insert into the top rear of the air box and a plug into the intake. Then using it for a month locally then switching back and doing a comparison. I need to find that brass threaded insert first. I should be able to heat-set it into the plastic, similar to the threaded inserts used in 3D printed parts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...