HOrnbrod Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 http://www.jk-forum.com/articles/jeep-wranglers-could-be-used-in-battlefields-again/?newsletter?utm_source=jan16&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=content Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimoshel Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 I'll take two. both pink. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HOrnbrod Posted February 18, 2016 Author Share Posted February 18, 2016 I hear pink camo will be an option, so you're in luck Jim. :yes: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete M Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 since the combat jobs are more and more going to armored rigs, a civilian-based ride makes sense for the other duties. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HOrnbrod Posted February 18, 2016 Author Share Posted February 18, 2016 It makes damn good sense especially now since our wonderful Prez has hacked and slashed the military budget to death. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shelbyluvv Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 I honestly don't see a use for a JK inspired combat vehicle. It is too wide to be transported by a Osprey. It isn't armored to use outside the wire in a combat role. It can't tow that much. It can't haul that much. All and all, while it is a good concept it will probably not happen. At least not as far as the Marine Corps is concerned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HOrnbrod Posted February 18, 2016 Author Share Posted February 18, 2016 The military Wrangler would be used to transport Army troops, much like the Willys MB did during World War II.......... Not for combat, more like a base taxi. :thumbsup: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rockfrog Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 That's the exact role the contractor is targeting. Troop transport in low risk environments. The same role the HMMVW filled back when it first came in. I could also see use as a light recce role. But honestly, there are better choices these days. They are pushing the cost savings though, due to use of a civilian production model. Up north we've done this same thing using civvy pattern trucks for low risk combat environments and basic transport needs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
budwisr Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 It makes damn good sense especially now since our wonderful Congress has hacked and slashed the military budget to death. Fixed it for you. Congress sets the budget. The "Prez" requested a 7.8 percent increase in Defense Department spending, Congress approved a 6 percent increase. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shelbyluvv Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 The military Wrangler would be used to transport Army troops, much like the Willys MB did during World War II..........Not for combat, more like a base taxi. :thumbsup:That's a whole lot of useless money spent on a "conus only" vehicle. If the military has it, they will use it. Where is the "train like you fight" mentality in this vehicle? The HMMWV needs to be replaced. The platform is 30 years old and it is past it's prime. I don't see a JK taking the place of a H1 though. The HMMWV is such a versatile platform. It will be hard to find another vehicle that will out perform it. I work hand and hand with the program office and program managers, we are keeping our HMMWVs for a few more years. The MC is looking for a all around vehicle. We have a few in mind. The one standout seems the have a Hummer feel but has a 6.6, Allison, independent suspension and full armor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HOrnbrod Posted February 19, 2016 Author Share Posted February 19, 2016 It makes damn good sense especially now since our wonderful Congress has hacked and slashed the military budget to death. Fixed it for you. Congress sets the budget. The "Prez" requested a 7.8 percent increase in Defense Department spending, Congress approved a 6 percent increase. You didn't fix anything. Of course the "Prez" requested an increase this time - he's on the way out. Look at his past military spending and manpower priorities record mate. Too little too late. Anyhow, all this is off topic - my fault - back to our regularly scheduled programming. :cheers: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HOrnbrod Posted February 19, 2016 Author Share Posted February 19, 2016 The military Wrangler would be used to transport Army troops, much like the Willys MB did during World War II..........Not for combat, more like a base taxi. :thumbsup:That's a whole lot of useless money spent on a "conus only" vehicle. If the military has it, they will use it. Where is the "train like you fight" mentality in this vehicle? The HMMWV needs to be replaced. The platform is 30 years old and it is past it's prime. I don't see a JK taking the place of a H1 though. The HMMWV is such a versatile platform. It will be hard to find another vehicle that will out perform it. I work hand and hand with the program office and program managers, we are keeping our HMMWVs for a few more years. The MC is looking for a all around vehicle. We have a few in mind. The one standout seems the have a Hummer feel but has a 6.6, Allison, independent suspension and full armor. The JK can never replace the HMMWV, it's apples and oranges and different missions. But I can visualize modified JKs transporting troops on and off posts both on-road and off-road all over the world, doing convoy escort, military police duties, etc. They are reliable, wouldn't be expensive to procure / convert / commission, economical to operate, and would help standardize maintenance. It's a good platform for jobs like that and would free up the HMMWVs or whatever replaces it currently doing these tasks. Just a note on HMMWVs: I was working at the Yorktown NavWepsSta back in the early 80's when they first came out and ran the radio shop there. We were tasked to install Motorola VHF radios in all of them, and I'll never forget how tough it was to drill the holes in the steel for the antennas. Nothing we had in the shop could touch it. As I recall we had to order special bits made in Germany and HD drills to pierce the skin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogmorgo Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 Interesting. I thought they were aluminum bodied, but maybe that's just the H1? I wonder what alloy it was. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Akula69 Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 hornbrod, on 18 Feb 2016 - 5:02 PM, said: QuoteThe military Wrangler would be used to transport Army troops, much like the Willys MB did during World War II.......... Not for combat, more like a base taxi. :thumbsup: I think you hit the nail on the head. In WWII, the Willys was a great platform for just about all facets, but fragile in the extreme. This JK concept wouldn't stand a ice cube's chance in h3ll against a 105MM IED....but would work in the far-to-the-rear roles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RustyRodder Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 hornbrod, on 18 Feb 2016 - 5:02 PM, said: QuoteThe military Wrangler would be used to transport Army troops, much like the Willys MB did during World War II.......... Not for combat, more like a base taxi. :thumbsup: I think you hit the nail on the head. In WWII, the Willys was a great platform for just about all facets, but fragile in the extreme. This JK concept wouldn't stand a ice cube's chance in h3ll against a 105MM IED....but would work in the far-to-the-rear roles. Id tend to agree with this- as a lightweight on base role, it would do well. Some parts crossover with civvy models isnt horrid either. I wonder if they would want to use the standard V6 or upgrade it to the 5.7? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimoshel Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete M Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 hornbrod, on 18 Feb 2016 - 5:02 PM, said: QuoteThe military Wrangler would be used to transport Army troops, much like the Willys MB did during World War II.......... Not for combat, more like a base taxi. :thumbsup: I think you hit the nail on the head. In WWII, the Willys was a great platform for just about all facets, but fragile in the extreme. This JK concept wouldn't stand a ice cube's chance in h3ll against a 105MM IED....but would work in the far-to-the-rear roles. Id tend to agree with this- as a lightweight on base role, it would do well. Some parts crossover with civvy models isnt horrid either. I wonder if they would want to use the standard V6 or upgrade it to the 5.7? I'd vote for the overseas diesel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
poopypants Posted February 20, 2016 Share Posted February 20, 2016 A pink camo jk cruising through jihadistan with Katy perry blasting over some 6x9's would make Isis leaders cloth laden heads explode...so I say order 1000 of them and load up our boys iPods :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
outlaw star Posted February 21, 2016 Share Posted February 21, 2016 Interesting. I thought they were aluminum bodied, but maybe that's just the H1? I wonder what alloy it was.Some are aluminum, some are steel bodied. It depends on its platform for service. Some are just troop transport, some are armored up. We're Engineers, we use both types. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shelbyluvv Posted February 21, 2016 Share Posted February 21, 2016 The bodies are all aluminum. They may have an armor applique over the body. Either way the actual body is 100% aluminum. I have been a Marine Corps Motor Transport mech for over 23 years and I know them inside and out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Incommando Posted February 21, 2016 Share Posted February 21, 2016 Either way the actual body is 100% aluminum. . Doesn't that apply to the Hummer H1 as well? Just curious Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shelbyluvv Posted February 21, 2016 Share Posted February 21, 2016 Yes they were built on the same assembly line as the HMMWV. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
outlaw star Posted February 21, 2016 Share Posted February 21, 2016 The bodies are all aluminum. They may have an armor applique over the body. Either way the actual body is 100% aluminum. I have been a Marine Corps Motor Transport mech for over 23 years and I know them inside and out.Thanks, should have clarified that better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rmoore1031 Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 I shared the link on Facebook a few weeks ago. I'm all for the JK military version or the JK replacement. Obviously it'll need to be diesel/JP8 compatiable. Its light and cheap! Pull up Fedlog on a Humvee, base model is like $35k... Decked out Jeep not close to that price. Plus y'all are forgetting the most important thing. In several years you can buy at auctions for cheap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HOrnbrod Posted February 23, 2016 Author Share Posted February 23, 2016 The bodies are all aluminum. They may have an armor applique over the body. Either way the actual body is 100% aluminum. I have been a Marine Corps Motor Transport mech for over 23 years and I know them inside and out. The first to show up back in the day at NAVWEPSTA had an armored steel shell, at least 1/4" thick, that surrounded the interior personnel compartment. They were heavy and slow, and the jarheads, who handled the security duties at all Naval weapons stations then because nobody did it better, hated them. It got tiresome listening to the bitching at the club. :yes: The auto trannys were especially funky and breakdowns were frequent. These were among the first batch the military fielded, and they had teething problems, most all later corrected I guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now