Jump to content

lift heights


Recommended Posts

So I bought my project truck and it has a soa swap in the rear and 4.5 inch coils in the front. I'm looking to swap the front coils out for 6.5 inch clayton coils. It appears that the soa swap on the dana 44 gained 4 inches when done compared to factory height specs. I guess what I'm trying to come up with is how to gain 2 inches in the rear to level the ride height. Does anyone make 2 inch lift springs. Do you think a new set of factory springs with an aal would net me 2 inches? I do not want to use lift block and would prefer to stay away from longer shackles but will go that route if necessary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You really think that my leafs could have 2 inches of sag? I mean they are probably 28 years old but they are not flat by any means. Using the guide on here for factory ride height it says that the height on a factory 4x4 in the rear is 9 1/4 inches from top of axle tube to bottom of frame. I am only getting a measurement of 13 inches with a soa. so really it only gained 3 3/4 inches. I'm sure that I have some droop but do you really think I could achieve another 2 1/4 inches from a new set of factory springs? Looking at replacement springs I see 3+2 or 3+1. I am assuming a 3+1 would allow more flex but would they have the same height or relativaly close payload. Any suggestions on good replacement springs that will allow good flex to match up with the long arm kit I install on the front.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Numbers don't lie. The minimum gain you can get from a SOA conversion is the sum of the axle tube diameter + 2x spring perch offset + leaf pack thickness.

 

 

A D44 tube is what, 2-3/4"? The spring pack is another 1-1/2". and the perch offset is about 1/2" x 2. That's 5-1/4" ... minimum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I understand that. I guess I just wanted to make sure that those factory spec numbers were actually correct. I have a set of 3+1's in there now and think I will go with another set of 3+1's for rear suspension flex. I'm sure I will be loosing payload capacity but I'm not planning on doing much hauling with this rig when its finished anyway. Maybe I'll see how much I gain from a new set of leafs then decide from there how much more I need to account for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well does anyone have any reccomendations on finding factory rear spring replacements? I keep seeing springs from crown spring but they say they fit mjs and xjs. I was under the assumption that mj springs are longer then xj springs by a few inches. I could be wrong though. I also came across springs from sd truck and general spring, both of those appear to be mj specific.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am in need of rear leafs no matter what, so once they are installed I will figure out what height I am going to use in the front. 5.5 coils will be too short for the clayton setup I will be using in the front. The clayton setup requires a minimum of 6 inch front lift for proper clearance. I believe iam pretty set with using their 6.5 coils up front and I am trying to get the rear up to a matching height. At this point I am just looking for which replacement leaf springs are worth spending my money on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two suppliers of springs for our MJs are General Springs out of KC, MO and Hell Creek.  

 

I have GS on mine with the 3:2, military wrap.  These lifted the rear by about 3" from the old sagging springs.  I has to put 2" spacers up front.  I kept mine SUA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3:1 - the first is the number of main leaves, the second is the "helper" spring.  The second gives additional support for heavy loads.

 

3:2 - has an additional helper spring.

 

I will find photo of my springs.

 

3:2 Springs

 

Military wrap

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What are you guys referring to on the 3+1 and 3:2 etc.?

 

There is also a 4:1 configuration; four main leafs + one overload leaf. 3:2 and 4:1 springs are considered metric ton springs and have a higher rated load carrying capacity than the stock 3:1 springs.

 

3:2 example:

 

Image Not Found

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have hell creeks 3+2 springs. They are nice, I have put some full loads of rock in my bed, probably dangerously overloaded. Flattened the springs almost to the bump stops. But they did add a significant lift over my old sagging springs. My SOA netted about 8 inches, then I swapped to the HC springs and had a good rake. Because of MN ridiculous lift/bumper height laws and a visit by a trooper, I have to swap them out for the 3+1 springs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have hell creeks 3+2 springs. They are nice, I have put some full loads of rock in my bed, probably dangerously overloaded. Flattened the springs almost to the bump stops. But they did add a significant lift over my old sagging springs. My SOA netted about 8 inches, then I swapped to the HC springs and had a good rake. Because of MN ridiculous lift/bumper height laws and a visit by a trooper, I have to swap them out for the 3+1 springs

Maybe pull one of the over load leafs out and see where it sits?

Unless, you have a buyer for your leafs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I have hell creeks 3+2 springs. They are nice, I have put some full loads of rock in my bed, probably dangerously overloaded. Flattened the springs almost to the bump stops. But they did add a significant lift over my old sagging springs. My SOA netted about 8 inches, then I swapped to the HC springs and had a good rake. Because of MN ridiculous lift/bumper height laws and a visit by a trooper, I have to swap them out for the 3+1 springs

Maybe pull one of the over load leafs out and see where it sits?

Unless, you have a buyer for your leafs.

 

 

 

that only works if the overload leafs are providing lift, which they aren't in his photo because they don't touch the leafs above. at best he'd lose the thickness of the spring.  :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought about that too, looking at specs on line there is almost an inch difference in the leaf pack thickness, so that drops me a little,

The other thing i was wondering about is if there is any ride height differencein the first 3 leaves between the 2 different packs.

 

 

No buyer as of yet, but in the next month or 2 I will have swapped out for the lighter pack,  and will have the HC metric ton leaves for sale, and this summer i will be moving from duluth to the seattle area so i could possible deliver in reson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought about that too, looking at specs on line there is almost an inch difference in the leaf pack thickness, so that drops me a little,

The other thing i was wondering about is if there is any ride height differencein the first 3 leaves between the 2 different packs.

The factory service manual tells us how to measure ride height, and there is only one spec for 2WD and one spec for 4WD. Both specs are plus-or-minus 1/2-inch, but there's no mention of one spring type riding higher or lower than another.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A factory metric ton spring will provide the same ride height as a factory 3+1 spring. The metric ton pack is thicker by 3/4 inch but the springs have 3/4 inch less arch so it provides the same height.

The MJ in factory configuration has the rear springs under the axle. The thickness of the leaf pack doesn't matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...