Worlds Fastest Comanche Posted August 23, 2010 Share Posted August 23, 2010 You may think I am in the wrong place to talk about areodynamics, our trucks are built like bricks. But if we could get them a little more areodynamic, maybe we could save some gas. One thing i learned at Bonneville is that the most areodynamic bed cover is half a bed cover. A cover that starts in the middle of the bed and goes towards the rear. It needs to have a verticle bulkhead from the floor to the cover. This design was used on the 1990 GMC Syclone. It came from extensive testing in the GM wind tunnel. I have been trying to find out the Drag Coeifecient of my Comanche, i found a published number for a 91 Cherokee, it was .45 The Frontal area was 25.84 ft/sq or 2.4 m/sq. i don't know if drag would be the same for a Comanche. I asume the frontal area would be the same. Maybe we can help each other out here. I found a excel program that lets you calculate the Cd (drag Coeificent) and rolling resistance of a car, you can find the spreasheet and procedure here http://www.instructables.com/id/Measure-the-drag-coefficient-of-your-car/ It would be interisting to get numbers for stock comanches, lifted, different tires etc. It would give us a good idea what changes we can make to save gas, and what changes not to make that will cause a large change in either Cd or rolling resistance. It would be good the do the test before making changes, then after the change to see if you made things better or worse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
comanche12 Posted August 23, 2010 Share Posted August 23, 2010 that or just remove ur tail gate by reduce weight plus less drag. i think Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete M Posted August 23, 2010 Share Posted August 23, 2010 that or just remove ur tail gate by reduce weight plus less drag. i think mythbusters busted that one. :thumbsup: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete M Posted August 23, 2010 Share Posted August 23, 2010 One thing i learned at Bonneville is that the most areodynamic bed cover is half a bed cover. A cover that starts in the middle of the bed and goes towards the rear. It needs to have a verticle bulkhead from the floor to the cover. This design was used on the 1990 GMC Syclone. It came from extensive testing in the GM wind tunnel. so then the small vortex that forms behind the cab gives its best results when it's restricted to about 3 feet of bed room? that makes sense. It'd be about as wide as it is tall as I imagine it wants to swirl in a circle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beepbeepmyredjeep Posted August 23, 2010 Share Posted August 23, 2010 I wonder if a Jeep 2500 conversion would help with aerodynamics a little? Or maybe at least try to add the front of an early model ZJ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beepbeepmyredjeep Posted August 23, 2010 Share Posted August 23, 2010 By the way, once I get the MJ back up and running again (still working on the CMC) I could possibly perform some tests with and without my bed cap. That should help I would think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Worlds Fastest Comanche Posted August 24, 2010 Author Share Posted August 24, 2010 that or just remove ur tail gate by reduce weight plus less drag. i think Look around the internet, you can actually get worse gas miliage with the tailgate removed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Worlds Fastest Comanche Posted August 24, 2010 Author Share Posted August 24, 2010 so then the small vortex that forms behind the cab gives its best results when it's restricted to about 3 feet of bed room? that makes sense. It'd be about as wide as it is tall as I imagine it wants to swirl in a circle. You broke the code, 100% correct. Somthing could probably also be done with vortex generators near the rear of the roof Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Automan2164 Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 That eco modder site is pretty cool. What about something like this Peter? http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthread.p ... -7333.html Rob L. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HOrnbrod Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 Ecocap! Even with my Leer MJ cap on, I get 3-4 more MPG on the freeway than w/o it. I suspect though that the extra weight hauling it around town eats that savings up............ :( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beepbeepmyredjeep Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 A word of caution with regards to the "Aerojeep". Your design resembles that of an airplane wing. You could actually create "lift" with this design at higher speeds. See http://www.allstar.fiu.edu/aero/experiment1.htm You could possibly reduce fuel efficiency at higher speeds due to less traction. Worst case scenario, you could possibly lose control of the truck due to the front wheels coming off the ground. This *MIGHT* be ok for normal highway driving ~65 MPH. However, it would DEFINITELY not recommend it for LSR-3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Worlds Fastest Comanche Posted August 24, 2010 Author Share Posted August 24, 2010 I was reading about the design of the Cobra hardtop, the rear of the car is kind of flat, but the shape creates a bubble that acts like a tapered surface, The same idea could be applied to Pickups, we just need an expert in aerodynamics to design it, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HOrnbrod Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 A word of caution with regards to the "Aerojeep". Your design resembles that of an airplane wing. You could actually create "lift" with this design at higher speeds. See http://www.allstar.fiu.edu/aero/experiment1.htm You could possibly reduce fuel efficiency at higher speeds due to less traction. Worst case scenario, you could possibly lose control of the truck due to the front wheels coming off the ground. This *MIGHT* be ok for normal highway driving ~65 MPH. However, it would DEFINITELY not recommend it for LSR-3. Just curious who/what you are referring to?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
comanche12 Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 that or just remove ur tail gate by reduce weight plus less drag. i think mythbusters busted that one. :thumbsup: oh dang curse u Adam and Jamie! lol :fs2: i gotta have miss that part :roll: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timmaay Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 How about you dimple it like a golf ball. Start watching at about 2:20. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nufXpDBELdQ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
btm24 Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 With my 2.5 and 5 speed, I have gotten 30 MPG on one tank (last time I filled up, actually) and I want to push it further. wtf 30? i get like 10:( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mkbruin Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 :needpics: need pics of bedcoverings, front mods, etc. So far the only pic is a slantback F150. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kastein Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 Ecocap! Even with my Leer MJ cap on, I get 3-4 more MPG on the freeway than w/o it. I suspect though that the extra weight hauling it around town eats that savings up............ :( I bet you could do pretty good with an industrial size roll of pallet wrap / "bigass saran-wrap" and some hoops. It might look like your Jeep got attacked by a spider though. With my 2.5 and 5 speed, I have gotten 30 MPG on one tank (last time I filled up, actually) and I want to push it further. wtf 30? i get like 10:( I get 16-18 on 225s, 4.0L/AW4/3.55s in the axles doing up to 80-85mph on the highway combined with city driving, all with a heavy hammer foot. I get 23mpg on the highway if I drive like a granny 55-65mph... with 1400lbs of stuff in the back. If you gear it right, replace your air filter, replace your upstream O2 sensor, eliminate cracks and leaks in the exhaust upstream of the O2 sensor, and set your tire pressure you can get some real good gas mileage. The best part? The engine and trans are (as far as I know) original equipment, never had a major overhaul, and have 227kmi on them. EDIT: replace your thermostat too as noted by the last guy, 195 degree only, the 4.0 runs great when it's at 180-210 degrees or so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deziped Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 Cheese 429 how many horses are being robbed by those big paddle mirrors hanging on your doors? Their pushing a lot of wind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akamcbird Posted August 25, 2010 Share Posted August 25, 2010 speed holes??? this can be accomplished with a riffle or a pic axe :brows: thecheese429 awesome rims... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Worlds Fastest Comanche Posted September 11, 2010 Author Share Posted September 11, 2010 A true representative of the Comanche Club. Make sure your sticker is still visible with the cover on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dakal Posted September 11, 2010 Share Posted September 11, 2010 how about applying the (kamm) theory to the roof line? ie. extending the roof line a bit so the air moves cleaner past the cab? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Worlds Fastest Comanche Posted September 11, 2010 Author Share Posted September 11, 2010 how about applying the (kamm) theory to the roof line? ie. extending the roof line a bit so the air moves cleaner past the cab? Good Point, you can probably get similar results by extending the roof line, putting a bulkhead halfway back in the bed, to create a swirl behind the cab, then taper from the bulkhead to the rear of the bed floor, remove the tail gate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fiatslug87 Posted September 11, 2010 Share Posted September 11, 2010 Won't this shred at anything over 25 mph? Is it just 3mil plastic? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AMCJeepMJ Posted October 14, 2010 Share Posted October 14, 2010 I've read this thread, then I went back and re-read it. I did not see any mention of taping joints (like hood to fender, bed to cab, etc.) and wonder if they would be of any advantage... even 1/4 of a mile/gal improvements. Maybe some plexi sheets over the headlight bezels? Also coming to mind is the flow of air beneath the trucks. Comanche's aren't very pretty underneath and there's loads of pockets and ridges hiding in plain sight. Any thoughts about what can be done to assist airflow beneath? Anyone consider a diffuser for the rear beneath the bed like the back of a 458 Italia or 430 Scuderia... maybe incorporated into a rollpan? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now