eaglescout526

I wonder if one of those two isn’t recognizing such cold temps. Does the issue persist say after driving around for a bit, go into the store, come back out and starts up with no issue?

I found the same when I ran my 84 XJ through. Renix TBI slashed the results in half.

Have you measured any of the temp sensors that go to the Renix computer? CTS and MAT?

Lol! Youre welcome.

Yes. We put a Christmas tree on the roof.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/335507798427?mkcid=16&mkevt=1&mkrid=711-127632-2357-0&ssspo=P5stATT4Rwm&sssrc=4429486&ssuid=n7myxbO3SYC&var=&widget_ver=artemis&media=COPY

https://www.ebay.com/itm/395910656327?mkcid=16&mkevt=1&mkrid=711-127632-2357-0&ssspo=ZJno_ByoTTq&sssrc=4429486&ssuid=n7myxbO3SYC&var=&widget_ver=artemis&media=COPY This is that door panel that has the three tone on it that’s a little elusive. Neat to see a new one.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/335678443415?mkcid=16&mkevt=1&mkrid=711-127632-2357-0&ssspo=P5stATT4Rwm&sssrc=4429486&ssuid=n7myxbO3SYC&var=&widget_ver=artemis&media=COPY Neat find.

I got this cool gem the other day

Ok so yes the 55 in pounds is correct torque. Now if you reallllllly want to get to the nitty gritty. Theres an 84-86 procedure and theres an 87-88 procedure. And I love the 87-88 as it says this "1987-1988 Install the cover on the cylinder head Tighten the mounting bolts to 6.2 Nm (55 in-lbs) torque."

I’ve never trusted Haynes or chiltons manuals for anything other than basics and when official material isn’t available. But I would still run both gasket and RTV on the plastic as I’ve had gaskets get a little squished even though there torqued to spec and for the aluminum guys, probably just the gasket will do just fine as they don’t run a huge risk for warp. I’ll get the details this evening from my 2.5L book.

I mean it’s not wrong. It covers both the rockers and valves. Actually that 55in pounds might be more correct. I’ll need to double check with my 2.5L book. I can only speculate I got 11 as the numbers being the same. Im surprised a manual like that would recommend RTV all the way vs getting the gasket and some RTV unless the text is based on the assumption you have the gasket and to put some RTV on the cover.

I would start there unless you have a lead on an aluminum cover and everything else for the swap. What I did was get a genuine valve cover gasket, don’t think Chrysler has them anymore, put some RTV on the cover and put the gasket with the RTV to make alignment easier and then mount the cover. Now the cover does have torque specs so you don’t crack or warp it. It’s about 11 ft pounds.

So with the 2.5L and what I learned over the years is the plastic remake from crown is an absolute pile of dog crap. Do not buy it and stay as far away from them as possible. now that my rant is out of the way. Stick with OEM on the valve cover. AMC and Chrysler used a harder thicker plastic that crown doesn’t seem to know. Either they’re too cheap to make true restoration parts or have never worked on an XJ or MJ. I still run the original hard plastic valve cover and have little to no issues with leaks what so ever. As long as you have the right gasket and some RTV. Now the hard plastic covers are supposed to have a reusable gasket so you don’t have to use RTV with the separate gasket that you get but I’d expect that gasket to be old and failing Now to aluminum covers. Id use one but they don’t have the AMC logo and appeal entirely to the aesthetic I want. Now you do have to do some vacuum rerouting to use the aluminum cover. Oh and you have to get the bolts for the cover too. Can’t reuse the old shoulder bolts from the plastic cover. No. You don’t have to be worried here at all. The valve cover is meant to prevent the oil from leaking out of the top from the rockers. The vapors from oil then get sucked up by the throttle body and thrown into the combustion chamber. Be next to near impossible to blow your head gasket from a sealed valve cover.

So heres the two numbers for the temp for 1986/87 J3242662 8953004981 Oil sensor 8953004550 which should supersede to a later Mopar number, I forget what it is.

Anddddd trailing behind that surprise of low fuel was a nasty one of a failing fuel pump. What a chase that was and damn near exhausted me while almost running out of ideas. Swapped to a different sending unit with an original AMC pump that believe it or not, still works. I want to go back to the 86 unit and I probably will when I get the right pump as this unit holds a smaller than what were used to seeing pump Funny enough, this is the unit that came with the fuel tank and I didnt do a damn thing to it other than swap the pump to a different unit and then back and then swapped the float reader to find the pump failing. Also got cruise control finally dialed in. I found a pic online of an 86 MJ with the 2.5L and it had cruise control. So this gave me an idea to move the servo to match the location of where AMC mounted it using the correct mount, I actually happen to have two of to my surprise and put it on along with using a 4.0L cable. Finally a 4.0L part I can use! Haha.

Oh crap yours is an 86. There’s two different sensors for the temp in the head. I’ll get you some part numbers this evening but the oil sensor is pretty straight forward. MoPar still makes the oil sensor and would be the wisest route to go for that sensor. Otherwise everything is plug and play.

Seal is the same for both windows.

Not sure if you’re on any of the Facebook pages but try there too. The only problem I see with this is the glass is becoming increasingly rare unless you know someone who can either make the solid pane or the three panes. And then it boils down to the aluminum frame on the sliders. Dont get me wrong, I’m all for this. The newest pieces is about 32-25 years, depending on how long Chrysler serviced the rear glass. I just think that’s something to consider.

Yes it is. Jeep uses a different switch too. I’ll get you a part number. But the stalk being droopy makes me think that the screw holding the switch to the turn signal switch assembly is loose inside and thus you’re having a tremendous amount of issues with that area.

IT WAS THE FUEL PUMP!!!!!! HAHAHAHA! @Eagle_SX4 Thank you for your chime on the fuel pump!! I owe you a 4 pack of glass bottle Dr.Pepper!

There is, its a nonstandard size cause AMC and Renault. I can either get the dealer tool which not many out there that are complete or I can cobble something together using the right size threads and adapters to a gauge. I recall someone somewhere did this. Butttttt I think youre on the right track. So I took my TB off, found out that my stupid over excited self put the TB on with left over gasket still on the mating surface. Cleaned it off, put a new gasket on and now my idle is more correct at 1K RPM vs the 13-1500 RPM I was at. Ok one problem solved. I also looked at the regulator while I had it off and its good, clean and not ripped. Which brings me to my test drive. I drove it successfully for half a mile. Made it half way down my street before it started sputtering. I got it back into my driveway and remembered what you had to do with your eagle. So I primed the rail about 5 times. On the 5th time, I cranked and got it started and revved it like there was no issue at all. Typically if I got it started, it would have issues revving past 2k. So I think youre right about the fuel pump my friend!

Annnnnd there’s nothin in this kit that will work. Damn.

Interesting. I found the kit. I’m gonna see what pressure looks like.

My thoughts too. I’m gonna go get this kit. But what’s odd to me is if I compare the spray pattern of the injector on both my engines. They look the same. But I guess if to the naked eye they look the same but perhaps on the atom scale, it isn’t.