a1awind Posted December 6, 2007 Posted December 6, 2007 was at barnes and noble today and was flipping through the "History of Jeep Part 2". and found a paragraph that blatantly states that the Comanche was axed because it was a competitor to the Dakota! finally someone admits to one of Chryslers big mistakes.
jeepthing07 Posted December 7, 2007 Posted December 7, 2007 was at barnes and noble today and was flipping through the "History of Jeep Part 2". and found a paragraph that blatantly states that the Comanche was axed because it was a competitor to the Dakota! finally someone admits to one of Chryslers big mistakes. Same things in a jeep book i have had for years i think its called "jeep the unstopable legend" or something like that. It's a shame...
tkgibbs27 Posted December 7, 2007 Posted December 7, 2007 i had actually read that about a month ago on the internet, i forget what i was looking up, but it had something to do with jeeps and it had a bit of info on that.
whowey Posted December 7, 2007 Posted December 7, 2007 If that book is by Jim Allen, he has stated that several times in other books he has written about Jeeps.
pingpong Posted December 7, 2007 Posted December 7, 2007 It was said before that book.... Thats why they won't bring it back either.. will compete with the Ram's now
MJ'87 Posted December 7, 2007 Posted December 7, 2007 was at barnes and noble today and was flipping through the "History of Jeep Part 2". and found a paragraph that blatantly states that the Comanche was axed because it was a competitor to the Dakota! finally someone admits to one of Chryslers big mistakes. yeah, i read that on i think wikipedia
DansGreyMj Posted December 8, 2007 Posted December 8, 2007 I knew that but, Why did they kill the xj?
Burls Posted December 8, 2007 Posted December 8, 2007 I knew that but, Why did they kill the xj? Aging platform. I read somewhere that the Grand was supposed to replace the XJ, but Chrysler kept it off the chopping block because XJ sales were still going strong(No idea how true that is).
a1awind Posted December 9, 2007 Author Posted December 9, 2007 the xj was too reliable probably. When i was a ford service adviser we periodically had designers and engineers come in. I had an engineer tell me to my face that "the 300 inline 6 was replaced with the 4.2 because the 300 was too reliable". i had always heard of that but i didn't believe it till then!
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now