Jump to content

Larger tires on the Rear


Recommended Posts

Logic tells me I can mismatch tire sizes front to rear as I have a RWD and many muscle cars have done it but can someone confirm that is true for the comanche for me?

 

I have a ton of mostly worn tires but I can make a set of good tires for the Jeep with a pair of 245's up front and 30.5's rear. This shouldn't cause any harm should it?

 

Also seems the PO put some 2" BB spacers up front but I don't believe any rear lift so the added rear height may actually level it (if it is actually off, I can't tell if the shackles are stock or not as of yet)

 

Sorry for a kind of ignorant first post :P

 

Thanks

Dave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As long as you're 2wd, there's no issue having different size tires in the back. You may have issues with loss of power depending on your axle gearing, and your speedometer will need the gear changed to keep it accurate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As long as you're 2wd, there's no issue having different size tires in the back. You may have issues with loss of power depending on your axle gearing, and your speedometer will need the gear changed to keep it accurate.

 

Well I'm actually going down from 31's so no power loss :D

Speedo is also broken and I'm using my iPhone GPS and a speedo app so no worries there right now...

 

May also need to aim your headlights a bit higher.

 

haha, hadn't thought about that. Thanks

 

30.5" BFG MT's

245 Hankook A/T's

 

Definately has no lift on the rear but 2" on the front so some lift shackles shall be in her future

 

Thank you guys

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Logic tells me I can mismatch tire sizes front to rear as I have a RWD and many muscle cars have done it but can someone confirm that is true for the comanche for me?

 

I have a ton of mostly worn tires but I can make a set of good tires for the Jeep with a pair of 245's up front and 30.5's rear. This shouldn't cause any harm should it?

245 by what? And when you say 30.5s ... that's not a tire size. Are you really talking about 31x10.50s, which are typically 30.5" in diameter, or are you talking about 30x9.50s, which are typically 29.5" in diameter?

 

245/75-15s are also 29.5" in diameter. 245/70-15s are 28.5" in diameter.

 

245/75-16s are 30.5" in diameter.

 

What do you have?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Logic tells me I can mismatch tire sizes front to rear as I have a RWD and many muscle cars have done it but can someone confirm that is true for the comanche for me?

 

I have a ton of mostly worn tires but I can make a set of good tires for the Jeep with a pair of 245's up front and 30.5's rear. This shouldn't cause any harm should it?

245 by what? And when you say 30.5s ... that's not a tire size. Are you really talking about 31x10.50s, which are typically 30.5" in diameter, or are you talking about 30x9.50s, which are typically 29.5" in diameter?

 

245/75-15s are also 29.5" in diameter. 245/70-15s are 28.5" in diameter.

 

245/75-16s are 30.5" in diameter.

 

What do you have?

 

I stand corrected, I don't know where 30.5 came from.

 

The rears are a 30x9.5 R15

and the fronts are 245/75 R15

 

So off your statement I'd say I'm splitting hairs in sizes anyways

 

Cheers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So off your statement I'd say I'm splitting hairs in sizes anyways

 

Pretty much.

 

Let's see if this will show up large enough to read:

 

 

Thanks all for the help

 

And thanks Eagle for the chart, that is an awesome one for sure.

 

Cheers

Dave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In that chart, you will see that there are two columns marked "Revolutions per mile." The one under "Theoretical" is filled in for every tire. Those values are calculated based on the tire dimensions. The other one, under "Actual," doesn't have a value for every tire. Where the "Actual" numbers are filled in, they were taken directly off manufacturers published tire specs and should be considered more accurate than the column under "Theoretical."

 

The "Theoretical" revolutions per mile numbers don't account for sidewall squat, which (as you can see looking at the tires that show a manufacturer's static radius) reduces the rolling radius to less than half of the calculated tire diameter. Smaller radius ==> more revolutions per mile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...