Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I know it may seem a bit dumb, but I am bugged by how the rear wheels on an MJ are about 1 to 1 1/2 inches deeper into the fender well than the front wheels. I want to fix that. Options:

1. Aftermarket wheels with less backspace, but then they stick out too far on the front if the same width. :ack:

2. Aftermarket wheels and put 8" wide on the back and 6" inch on the front, but that does not trip my trigger either. :shake:

3. Stock wheels for the back widened by 2 inches, but MAN! That's expensive with shipping, etc., to the places I know of, unless anyone knows of a place in the St. Louis area that does that work, maybe Kansas City. :???:

4. Different looking wheels on the back than the front. YUCK! :grrrr:

5. 7 inch wide wheels where the front have the same backspacing as the stock wheels, but the rear with 1 to 1 1/2 inch less backspace. :???:

6. Spacers, but it would need to be at least 1 inch spacers. :dunno:

 

Quickest fix is spacers, and that, too, is about 80 smackeroo's. And, I've heard pro's and con's to spacers. Truck is highway only, 4x2, but occasionally hauls a fairly hefty load of stuff needed for landscaping, etc.

 

Ya'all got opinions? Know of aftermarket wheel companies that offer variable backspacing on the wheels I choose? Spacers a safe option? :roll:

Posted

Your cheapest bet is with spacers for the rear , however depending on your lift offset wheels will rub on the inner and outer fender

in the front anyway . IMHO I like the look of the offset wheels , if you run down to a wheel shop you could get more of an idea of a custom

offset that will be different from front to back but with matching offset wheels I can't even tell the difference , much less noticeable than

stock offset wheels .

Posted

Just some food for thought , narrower rear track reduces under-steer . Take a look at old sportscars with achaic suspention like our trucks used this narrower rear axel trick to improve handling :cheers:

Posted

The rear axle on an MJ is no narrower than the front axle. The body is just a lot wider.

 

I have run spacers for a year and a half without problems. Before that I ran spacers on my Suburban for years without problems.

 

If I may suggest a brand, I would say to go with Spidertrax hub centric ones. The ones list 87-06 Wrangler are the ones you need for an MJ. They are 1.25" (gives you a 2.5" wider track), which is just about right.

Posted

You guys are silly... getting rid of the rake.... making the rear axle wider so it looks like it isn't narrower...

 

MJs have a distinctive look. Personally I vote to keep it :D

Posted
Ya'all got opinions?

Yupp.

 

Spacers a safe option?

Yes ... if you get the ones that are machined from solid billet, not castings. They are expensive.

 

My opinion: If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

Posted

I have had a good experience with the SpiderTrax spacers on my TJ. I wanted to keep the factory Moabs with 35s.

 

As previously mentioned, hubcentric is the key to a safe spacer on a Jeep.

Posted

Thanks for the input. Will shoot for the 1.25 spacers. BTW, its a 4x2 so no lift and 225/70R -15 tires. More a "cosmetic" than practical thing.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...