jimoshel Posted April 8, 2010 Posted April 8, 2010 Does any one know what the 5 speed trans in the 1992 Eagle Talon was? I have the chance to get one, wrecked, but can't find any info on it. Since it 's Chrysler I'm thinking it might be a AX15 but nobody seems to know. The way the car is now I can't get to the tran to check it out. Jim :dunno:
jimoshel Posted April 8, 2010 Author Posted April 8, 2010 Everything I read says it was a joint venture between Mitsubishi and Chrysler.And that didn't answer my question. What transmission?
Pete M Posted April 8, 2010 Posted April 8, 2010 dunno, which trans it is, but isn't that a frontwheeldrive-based car with a transverse mounted engine?
kro10000 Posted April 8, 2010 Posted April 8, 2010 Yes it is transversely mounted, its a mitsubishi trans... I have had the oportunity to drive a 500hp one... It was very scary
kro10000 Posted April 8, 2010 Posted April 8, 2010 There is a Japanese car maker that uses a similar trans... Did you know that you can use hop ups for toyota supras in an AX15... Thats whatre used in my bros Terminator AX-15
DJM/78 Posted April 8, 2010 Posted April 8, 2010 Same trans as the mitsubishi GS , GST , GSX eclipse . not sure of the part no # but a TSI is all wheel drive like the GSX , same motor and drivetrain . I think they used allot of the same components on the turbo Neon as well . The drivetrain has major problems like a god awful timing belt and tensioner , once one of those fails once , you just swiss cheesed all 16 valves real quick . I did that twice before getting rid of the POS .
kro10000 Posted April 8, 2010 Posted April 8, 2010 :agree: They are definately not the most reliable vehicles around
one_bad_MJ Posted April 8, 2010 Posted April 8, 2010 Not Chysler.... Mitsubishi its made by chysler its diamond star motors DSM no its not a ax-15 the AWD trans has a t-case that bolts to the side to run the RWD for all of you trolls and people who want to argue this check out website i have been building race motors and turbo cars for 12 years now www.cimotorsports.net
jimoshel Posted April 8, 2010 Author Posted April 8, 2010 Finally! A answer to my question. Thank you, one_bad_MJ
Geonovast Posted April 8, 2010 Posted April 8, 2010 There is a Japanese car maker that uses a similar trans... Did you know that you can use hop ups for toyota supras in an AX15... Thats whatre used in my bros Terminator AX-15 A lot of Toyota transmissions are similar, because they're made by Aisin. I used to be in the Supra crowd, and they used the R151 (AX-15's cousin), and the AW-4 behind the 7M motors. I believe the 5Ms in the MKIIs used a cousin to the AX-5, as well as the smaller pickups with the 42RE motor.
jteckmann Posted April 8, 2010 Posted April 8, 2010 There is a Japanese car maker that uses a similar trans... Did you know that you can use hop ups for toyota supras in an AX15... Thats whatre used in my bros Terminator AX-15 A lot of Toyota transmissions are similar, because they're made by Aisin. I used to be in the Supra crowd, and they used the R151 (AX-15's cousin), and the AW-4 behind the 7M motors. I believe the 5Ms in the MKIIs used a cousin to the AX-5, as well as the smaller pickups with the 42RE motor. :hijack: Really? This is very interesting info to know. My first two cars were Supras: an '82 MKII with a 5-speed, and an '87 MKIII Turbo 5-speed. I gave the '82 to my Dad (after I bought the '86) almost 12 years ago. He used it as his daily commuter until just a couple years ago, when he decided to park it because the body was finally swiss-cheese. Despite that, the engine's still going strong with well over 350K on it. He wants to restore it, just doesn't have the time yet. The '86 is a different story - I owned it for about a year before I totaled it. Fell asleep at the wheel with the cruise control on :eek: and was extremely lucky to crawl away from the ensuing carnage. And the car + my own immaturity had got me in plenty of trouble before that. The wreck was a wake-up call, and I realized I'd be better off having fun in vehicles that couldn't regularly go +100mph. That's when I bought my ZJ and started getting into Jeeps :chillin: After the '86 was totaled, I pulled the engine, tranny, drivetrain, ECU and then had the rest of it towed off. The guts have all been sitting in a corner of may Dad's garage ever since. We always figured we'd eventually swap it into the MKII. So how similar are they? If you had a donor R151, AX15 and transfer case to swap parts between, would it be possible to have a Turbo'd 7M powered, 4x4 MJ? :brows:
Rymanrph Posted April 8, 2010 Posted April 8, 2010 Same trans as the mitsubishi GS , GST , GSX eclipse . not sure of the part no # but a TSI is all wheel drive like the GSX , same motor and drivetrain . I think they used allot of the same components on the turbo Neon as well . The drivetrain has major problems like a god awful timing belt and tensioner , once one of those fails once , you just swiss cheesed all 16 valves real quick . I did that twice before getting rid of the POS . I had an SRT-4 and I'm pretty sure that they share nothing in common. Always wanted one of these:
jteckmann Posted April 8, 2010 Posted April 8, 2010 5-speed Talons/Lasers/Eclipses used the Mitsubishi 5M transmissions and Mitsu transfer cases: http://www.drivetrain.com/parts_catalog/manual_transmission_overhaul_kits/eagle_summit_talon.html. I believe the auto's were 4-speeds that came from Chrysler. The engines are also different. Non-Turbo's had a Chrysler supplied engine that was based off the 2.0 Neon. Turbo's got the Mitsu 4G IMO, debating whether they're Chrysler or Mitsubishi is splitting hairs - they're a huge mix of both. Mitsu designed the platform, Chrysler styled it. They shared Chrysler/Mitsu engines & drivetrains, depending on the model. Built in an American plant that Chrysler fronted most the $$ for, managed in the Mitsu style. There was so much cross-pollination between the brands in the 80's & 90's, it's hard to keep track.
DJM/78 Posted April 9, 2010 Posted April 9, 2010 :agree: The first gen DSM's were better through manufacturer design , the early years used cast iron blocks better suited for over boosting but most of the non turbo neons , dsm's and eclipses used the chrysler motor and the turbo models all got the better mitsubishi power plant . Better cylinder head but shaty clutch , even the new lancers have faulty clutches . Instead of fixing the clutch problem the dealerships blame the people driving the cars and charge them for replacing it . That was my last straw with Mitsubishi when a spanking new OZ rally edition threw a clutch three months into owning it . I don't care how hard I was on it , the clutches should last at least three months . EEFFF MITSUBISHI !! They should have stuck to making airplanes and bombers for the JDF .
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now