Jump to content

4 cyl +auto questions


Recommended Posts

On man's pain is another man's gain. I love driving a stick. :D On the trails, daily commute in heavy traffic, doesn't matter. My left foot gets bored in the minivan and twitches in the Dakota looking for something to do.

 

 

I think the issue here isn't necessarily the automatic trans, but it's an automatic behind the 2.5L. Not exactly the best combo for power. :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On man's pain is another man's gain. I love driving a stick. :D On the trails, daily commute in heavy traffic, doesn't matter. My left foot gets bored in the minivan and twitches in the Dakota looking for something to do.

 

 

I think the issue here isn't necessarily the automatic trans, but it's an automatic behind the 2.5L. Not exactly the best combo for power. :(

 

do you really want to own up to adding a minivan???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't get me started on minivans. I love my minivan. :D All the minivan haters in the world really need to lighten up and get past the soccer mom stigma. My family has owned at least one at any given time since 1986 (got 2 right now). The first was a crappy aerostar. It was a stickshift though, which made it fun to drive (when it wasn't broken down). The rest have been Chryslers. It's just so dang versatile!! I've carried 7 people and their luggage down to Florida, or a fullsize 3 cushion couch (with the rear door closed too), or a big stack of plywood and 2x4s, or a few hundred pounds of landscaping rocks, or a couple axles and a pile other junkyard parts, and got a reliable 25 mpg while doing it. jamminz.gif The one I drive all the time is a '97 T+C and the only one we bought new rather than leased. It has 203k miles now and handles pretty darn well for what it is. The newer one ('06) sucks @$$ in the handling department. Chrysler really screwed up with that. The shocks are too soft, the brakes too grabby and the 3.8L is more gutless than my 10 year old 3.3L. The fold away seats and power doors make up for it though. I'm really looking forward to the next one. Roll down rear windows, touch screen radio, and maybe, just maybe, a chance to convince my dad to get the 4.0 jamminz.gif Too bad all-wheel-drive went away. :(

If I had to pick just one vehicle to own, would it be a minivan? Probably not. They can't go offroad very well (I've tried :D ). But I don't ever see myself not having one around. I can do anything (on the road) but tow a heavy load (and I fully expect to have a hitch on the next one, so I promise I'll be testing that particular deficiency asap :brows: ).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't get me started on minivans. I love my minivan. :D All the minivan haters in the world really need to lighten up and get past the soccer mom stigma. My family has owned at least one at any given time since 1986 (got 2 right now). The first was a crappy aerostar. It was a stickshift though, which made it fun to drive (when it wasn't broken down). The rest have been Chryslers. It's just so dang versatile!! I've carried 7 people and their luggage down to Florida, or a fullsize 3 cushion couch (with the rear door closed too), or a big stack of plywood and 2x4s, or a few hundred pounds of landscaping rocks, or a couple axles and a pile other junkyard parts, and got a reliable 25 mpg while doing it. jamminz.gif The one I drive all the time is a '97 T+C and the only one we bought new rather than leased. It has 203k miles now and handles pretty darn well for what it is. The newer one ('06) sucks @$$ in the handling department. Chrysler really screwed up with that. The shocks are too soft, the brakes too grabby and the 3.8L is more gutless than my 10 year old 3.3L. The fold away seats and power doors make up for it though. I'm really looking forward to the next one. Roll down rear windows, touch screen radio, and maybe, just maybe, a chance to convince my dad to get the 4.0 jamminz.gif Too bad all-wheel-drive went away. :(

If I had to pick just one vehicle to own, would it be a minivan? Probably not. They can't go offroad very well (I've tried :D ). But I don't ever see myself not having one around. I can do anything (on the road) but tow a heavy load (and I fully expect to have a hitch on the next one, so I promise I'll be testing that particular deficiency asap :brows: ).

 

everyone remind me to never pick on this guy! :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

but i know a guy who runs the tf904 behind the 2.8.

 

he wheels the snot out of that thing. but he has 32s. not sure of gear ratio..

 

 

here is a clip of him in action

 

 

I like my auto for wheeling. I've been thinking about swapping out my AW-4 for a non-lock up TF-999. I like to have a reverse shift pattern valve body and the accurate hard shifts that I can build it to have.

 

The crank mounted CPS is pretty expensive thou.

 

For those of you who don't know a TF999 is a HD wide ratio version of the TF904.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just one of my buttons, that's all. :cheers:

 

I've only owned one. A 1989 2.5 turbo that had 280HP and 335# of torque at the front tires. It was a blast to blow off 5.0 'stangs with 3 buddys in the van heckling the slow 'stang. That minivan ran a 12.72 best in the 1/4 mile on street tires. It was a great sleeper.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like to have a reverse shift pattern valve body and the accurate hard shifts that I can build it to have.

 

quote]

 

 

when i had my tf904 that i was going to use i was looking at that reverse vavle body.

 

You just need to make sure it is the one that has engine braking. The one I'm talking about also is a fully manual valve body.

 

I have one laying out in the garage I can build.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...