Jump to content

'86 MJ 2.5L ECM....good?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 611
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

1 minute ago, Ωhm said:

You need jumper at FP relay for voltage supply to pump. TL connected between (A) and (C).

Okay okay, I'm sorry but I got lost. Let's refresh.

 

So you want jumper in FP relay; okay, gotcha.

I thought we were testing FP harness on FP side while disconnect, so my bad. You want to test engine side FP harness, yes? Connected or disconnect? I still need a wire to plug into the connecter to clip on to for the TL though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SoCalManche said:

You want to test engine side FP harness, yes?

Yes

2 minutes ago, SoCalManche said:

Connected or disconnect?

Disconnect

 

If there're female terminal, yes one end of the TL (probe side) will work, but you may need something like a ice pick for the clip side. Be careful, you don't want them to touch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ωhm said:

Yes

Disconnect

 

If there're female terminal, yes one end of the TL (probe side) will work, but you may need something like a ice pick for the clip side. Be careful, you don't want them to touch.

Yeah, just did it.

 

(A) + (C) = BL.

 

(I haven't had this much fun in math for quite some time!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Ωhm said:

We still need to divide (X) out somehow.

 

1 minute ago, eaglescout526 said:

But were pretty damn close. 

 

I'm idle by watching the results

 

Comanche Math kids!

 

 

Am I delusional or does it seem like (X) is the injector? It doesn't account for the voltage drop at FP harness, but as for the fuel delivery itself, it may be clogged?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Purpose for testlight request, was it taxes the circuits better then a VM or ΩM would. Both VM & ΩM are high impedance instruments (low current flow). TL allows way more current to flow (ex: BL).


I think all tested circuits are good and not part of the problem. Back to solve for X.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, eaglescout526 said:

Whats bad is it is everywhere. Ive probably cleaned my C101 about 10 times and when my truck has some bizarre issue, I clean the C101 with electrical contact cleaner and that stuff still comes out.

Is it fine to scrape it off the bottom too, even if it isn't contacting the connectors?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, eaglescout526 said:

Good eye Ωhm. I even have the pic up on my second screen and the _C4 is right there in my face.

 

Here this will help:

IMG_7335.jpg.35ceb1f2b35d87329e16a3402c376ff8.jpg

Why does mine seem different? Missing prongs and seems to be more of a mirror image.

IMG_20200508_153419.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmmmmm, well what the pic is from the book is probably what you would see if you tore out the fuse box and were looking at that head on. So my guess is is that some of the prongs on the engine side are probably shared by two smaller clips on the otherside, say if it was a power or ground wire. But that's the only pic the 86 electrical manual gives of C100

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


×
×
  • Create New...