Egm89 Posted July 29, 2013 Share Posted July 29, 2013 As I was doing the cluster swap, I plugged back in everything as it was suppose to, and to test the new cluster I turn on the car, and everything was worming as suppose to, but the tach was idling at 2500 rpm, and I ask myself this is kinda odd, and became even more strange when I step on the gas a lil bit, and bum! The revs whent all the way to the little mark on the bottom of the tach that says "rpm x 100", as far as I know we don't have more than 7000 rpm, plus the red line its on 5500, the question is, do I need to calibrate this tach? Even thoe the donor was an 87 MJ 4 cyl, 5 spd; and I'm driving an 86 MJ 4 cyl 4 spd? Thanks in advance, Eddie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
onlyinajeep726 Posted July 29, 2013 Share Posted July 29, 2013 Are you sure that the cluster you got is original to that '87? If it came from a 4 banger, it should work in your 4 banger. I know when I did mine, it came from an XJ with the Inline 6 and the numbers were way off. I suspect maybe the previous owner of that '87 may have pulled cluster from a Jeep with the I6 and didn't calibrate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eagle Posted July 29, 2013 Share Posted July 29, 2013 There should be no adjustment needed when using a 4-cylinder tach in a 4-cylinder vehicle. Even if the tach came from a 6-cylinder, it wouldn't be that far off. The tach counts ignition pulses. The 4-banger has 2 pulses per revolution, the 6-cylinder has three. So let's say your engine idles at 1000 RPM (it doesn't, but it's simpler to visualize.) A 4-cylinder will then generate 2,000 pulses for 1,000 revolutions. A 6-cylinder will generate 3,000 pulses for those same 1,000 revolutions. So if a 6-cylinder tach is calibrated to read "1,000" when it sees 3,000 pulses, stick it in a 4-cylinder where it sees only 2,000 pulses and it'll read "666" RPM. Check the rear of your tach to see if it has the calibration potentiometer. Even if it does, it may not have that much adjustment in it. I suspect your "new" tachmoeter may be defective. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Egm89 Posted July 29, 2013 Author Share Posted July 29, 2013 I was suspecting the same thing, I even took it off and look for the potentiometer but here's what I found Kind of strange BTW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimoshel Posted July 29, 2013 Share Posted July 29, 2013 Just general information. Household voltage is 60 CPS. That's 3600 cycles in one minute. Take a filament transformer, or any device that will knock the 115VAC from the wall socket down to 6 VAC. When attached to a tach it will produce a reading of 3,600 RPM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eagle Posted July 29, 2013 Share Posted July 29, 2013 I was suspecting the same thing, I even took it off and look for the potentiometer but here's what I found Kind of strange BTW We have to see the back of the tach circuit board to tell if it has the potentiometer. Based on the design of the speedo dial, I suspect you have the early style cluster, which does not have the potentiometer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
onlyinajeep726 Posted July 29, 2013 Share Posted July 29, 2013 Get a cluster with tach from a '90 XJ or MJ. You'll be glad you did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Egm89 Posted July 29, 2013 Author Share Posted July 29, 2013 I was suspecting the same thing, I even took it off and look for the potentiometer but here's what I found Kind of strange BTW We have to see the back of the tach circuit board to tell if it has the potentiometer. Based on the design of the speedo dial, I suspect you have the early style cluster, which does not have the potentiometer. Well, it was from an 87 mj, with a 4 cyl engine as well, as I was doing my HW on this forum regarding the swap, they says a tack from a 86-87, would work good, and I plugged back eveything, and the speedo doesnt work, and all the needles wooble like crazy. I think i have to make another trip to the JY haha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Egm89 Posted July 29, 2013 Author Share Posted July 29, 2013 here's another shot of the tach Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skel130 Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 Speedo wobble is most often caused by the speedo cable being broken off at one end, or worn out. Check the cable (especially behind the dash) and make sure the 'end' that clips onto the cluster is attached to the outside of the cable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
87MJTIM Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 :hijack: Is a speedo cable the same between an '87 MJ and a '90 XJ - both with NP231 tcase? My speedo makes grinding noises and will jump up to 50 mph in 2nd gear, especially when its cold outside. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eagle Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 here's another shot of the tach We need to see the back face of the circuit board, the part that's against your hand. That's where the potentiometer is located. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mvusse Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 I was suspecting the same thing, I even took it off and look for the potentiometer but here's what I found Kind of strange BTW We have to see the back of the tach circuit board to tell if it has the potentiometer. Based on the design of the speedo dial, I suspect you have the early style cluster, which does not have the potentiometer. Some do. My 87 4 cylinder has a tack out of an 87 6 cylinder Wagoneer, and it did have the potentiometer to adjust it. Took me a lot of trial and error over a week's time to get it to read correctly based on GPS verified speed and speed to rev calculations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comanchecatcher Posted August 2, 2013 Share Posted August 2, 2013 I might be mistaken but isnt an 86 powered mechanically and an 87 electronic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comanchecatcher Posted August 2, 2013 Share Posted August 2, 2013 Nevermind thought wrong not applicable Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now