Informantion For All Gun Owners.

[Jeep Driver]

Reading comprehension is critical if you hope to intelligently engage in political discussion. Perhaps you overlooked this part of the proposed law that YOU cited:

 

 

 

So existing "large capacity" ammunition feeding devices are grandfathered. The only difference between this and the 1994 AWB is that in 1994 they grandfathered any magazines that were manufactured before the effective date. Got any idea how many that was? Here's a hint -- Para-Ordnance changed the color of their hi-cap magazines from black to nickel when the ban kicked in. Before the ban, they made as many hi-caps as they could. The effective date was approximately EIGHTEEN YEARS AGO.

 

You can STILL buy black, pre-ban, hi-capacity Para-Ordnance magazines today, from CDNN Sports in Texas.

 

And a limit on magazine capacity will not make your pistol suddenly illegal.

 

Get a grip on reality.

 

 

 

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CREC-2012-07-25/pdf/CREC-2012-07-25-pt1-PgS5401-3.pdf

SA 2575. Mr. LAUTENBERG (for himself, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. REED, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, Mr. SCHUMER,

and Mrs. FEINSTEIN) submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the bill S. 3414, to enhance the security and resiliency of the cyber and communications infrastructure of the United States; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows:

At the appropriate place, insert the following SEC. ll. PROHIBITION ON TRANSFER OR POSSESSION OF LARGE CAPACITY AMMUNITION FEEDING DEVICES.

(a) DEFINITION.—Section 921(a) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by inserting after paragraph (29) the following:

‘‘(30) The term ‘large capacity ammunition feeding device’—

‘‘(A) means a magazine, belt, drum, feed strip, or similar device that has a capacity of, or that can be readily restored or converted to accept, more than 10 rounds of ammunition; but

‘‘(B) does not include an attached tubular device designed to accept, and capable of operating only with, .22 caliber rimfire ammunition.’’.

(B) PROHIBITIONS.—Section 922 of such title is amended by inserting after subsection (u) the following:

‘‘(v)(1)(A)(i) Except as provided in clause (ii), it shall be unlawful for a person to transfer or possess a large capacity ammunition feeding device.

‘‘(ii) Clause (i) shall not apply to the possession of a large capacity ammunition feeding device otherwise lawfully possessed within the United States on or before the date of the enactment of this subsection.

‘‘(B) It shall be unlawful for any person to import or bring into the United States a large capacity ammunition feeding device.

‘‘(2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to—

‘‘(A) a manufacture for, transfer to, or possession by the United States or a department or agency of the United States or a State or a department, agency, or political subdivision of a State, or a transfer to or possession by a law enforcement officer employed by such an entity for purposes of law enforcement (whether on or off duty);

‘‘(B) a transfer to a licensee under title I of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 for purposes of establishing and maintaining an on-site physical protection system and security organization required by Federal law, or possession by an employee or contractor of such a licensee on-site for such purposes or off- site for purposes of licensee-authorized training or transportation of nuclear materials;

‘‘© the possession, by an individual who is retired from service with a law enforcement agency and is not otherwise prohibited from receiving ammunition, of a large capacity ammunition feeding device transferred to the individual by the agency upon that retirement; or

‘‘(D) a manufacture, transfer, or possession of a large capacity ammunition feeding device by a licensed manufacturer or licensed importer for the purposes of testing or experimentation authorized by the Attorney General.’’.

© PENALTIES.—Section 924(a) of such title is amended by adding at the end the following: ‘‘(8) Whoever knowingly violates section 922(v) shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both.’’.

(d) IDENTIFICATION MARKINGS.—Section 923(i) of such title is amended by adding at the end the following: ‘‘A large capacity ammunition feeding device manufactured after the date of the enactment of this sentence shall be identified by a serial number that clearly shows that the device was manufactured after such date of enactment, and such other identification as the Attorney General may by regulation prescribe.

’’.

 

 

___------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

 

What I am posting is an amemdment to CURRENT legislation.

 

 

This is what I do. This is what I study.

 

If you are going challenge me be sure better have the facts.

 

You want to mock me? fine, do so.

[Darren]

Wow! This guy is crazy, more so than Eagle even.

[ParadiseMJ]

it’s not hip to carry a gun anymore,

 

It never was.

 

Here's another article...to prove...that if it's in print, it MUST be true.

 

http://www.theonion....his-guns,30638/

[Jeep Driver]

This requires a brain- comparative thinking. Relates directly to my post above on the Eric Holder quote.

 

Obama should treat gun control like LBJ did civil rights

http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/12/14/obama-should-treat-gun-control-like-lbj-did-civil-rights/

 

Guest Post: Gun Grabbers Call For Re-Education Programs In Public Schools

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2012-12-20/guest-post-gun-grabbers-call-re-education-programs-public-schools

 

 

Point dated 12-14-12

Counter point dated 12-20-12

Current and relative.

 

Now for the Thinker......this relate directly to the KGB vid I posted on the first page......this is exactly what he was referring to in real time, TODAY.

[ParadiseMJ]

Wow! This guy is crazy, more so than Eagle even.

 

Yep...I'll unsubscribe now

[jimoshel]

"In order to conquer, first divide,"

[Jeep Driver]

Former Domestic Terrorist Bill Ayers Says “We Have Absolute Access to Schools”

 

 

posted on December 24, 2012by Gary DeMar

 

 

Read more: http://godfatherpolitics.com/8679/former-domestic-terrorist-bill-ayers-says-we-have-absolute-access-to-schools/#ixzz2G08bJ7oG

[shelbyluvv]

Pete, can I ban him?

 

At least let me delete his paranoid dribble!

[Pete M]

It's certain that some will find it annoying, but technically he's done nothing wrong. I find it hard to fault him for passing on info he thinks is important.

 

having said that, I do believe this thread has run its course and needs to be locked before it gets even more argumentative.