JeepcoMJ

I wish that I was...got busy, have things to do tomorrow. job interview at hribar in the a.m. I'll get it to Rob at some point for you. -Pat

HMMM. Sounds like there is a great story behind this comment. just search "harley mufflers" and laugh about it. I was stepping off your "redneck" screen name to something a redneck did...

[quote name="automan2164" BF? What a drag dude. But seriously' date=' a nice set of tools is a great thing to have. Can't tell you how irritating it is to go to a friends house, and his stuff is mismatched and Chinese. Great investment if you want to get into the hobby/career. Rob L.[/quote] hey, what's wrong with my tools?

it's not a vendetta. I just think that the way you worded it (rather harshly) was offensive. the way it was worded made it seem like you blame the victims, innocent or not, for being the victims.

that is a very poor, inconsiderate, and ill informed statement. innocent people get robbed all the time. I would guess that you're a Democrat. Wow. Still mad about Rough Country? You have no, zip, nada information about me or my history. Post up your qualifications to refute my statement, and I'll post mine to make it. On second thought, put me on ignore because I will certainly be ignoring you. This board is remarkably free of that kind of comment. I had hoped it would remain so. You e-stalking me because people pointed out you contradicted yourself in one of my posts is sad and tells me the real issue. http://www.comancheclub.com/forums/view ... =3&t=26609 actually, that ship has sailed. I post that statement because I know a nice couple that have been robbed twice...and neither of them have done anything wrong in their entire life. and I've never heard the results of gang wars and urban stupidity called "breaking and entering". so, it's inconsiderate to make that stereotyped generalization because it insinuates that, in order for there to be a break-in at your home, you must be a crook.

pics

I suppose. english to spanish and vice-versa doesn't always make literal sense either. I guess I'm just a bit anal about it being proper...if you can read a book or directions, which I know you can, then the written or typed things you say should be able to follow that same format and structure. I guess I don't have the ability to comprehend that. my only experiences with people who are deaf is brief, or my Uncle Pat (who, ironically, talks too much...). He wasn't deaf until he was 8 or 9...so I guess that's why he can structure things comprehensibly to me? I don't know...proper english isn't learned until later on in school, though.

Thank God...you don't have 4 harley mufflers on it :D :cheers:

i'm sorry to hear that. I laid into you because I figure since written English is most likely your primary means of communication, it should be comprehensible. nothing about proper English is verbal, it's all written. I backed off on that a ways back because it isn't worth it...you just don't care, so my opinion doesn't matter.

Surely I do. That's what I get for posting before proofreading. :doh: it's OK. as geonovast's signature suggests, it took me awhile to figure out why they call it a 69....

those quotes are bounced around lol.

surely you mean the 1989 that's in your sig lol.

C12....if no one responds, it's cause we're too smart to click the link...we've responded because you bumped a thread about a stupid car. and no one likes subarus. they're the only car that says "UR A Bus" if spelled backwards. overcomplicated piles of garbage...just like VW Corrados, but worse.

OP was rambling about the fact that he's well enough advised to know that he has options...not suggesting that he wants a full on '97 swap with a 3.1 or 3.4...which, other than making the tachometer work, would be easier and more "bolt-in" than any 4.0 conversion for that year.

LMAO!!!! EPIC WIN OF FAIL, genovast, you made my night if you noticed, there's no front input in the front tcase, and he already chopped the front housing down. so, he's just not done with it..

....and np207's are not worth their weight in scrap value. great fab skills...strange execution. it's still a polished turd.

remember not to drink them first. their 1 time usability will work better with the hydraulic shock absorbtion....plus you're saving yourself from death by not drinking that crap :P

yup. I only keep my walther p22 loaded. it's a .22 cal hand gun...cheap, easy, effective...and will do twice as much internal damage, with 10 rounds at easy access. the rifles don't stay loaded. parts for WWII era guns are not cheap and can be hard to find...trying to save wear and tear.

that is a very poor, inconsiderate, and ill informed statement. innocent people get robbed all the time. I would guess that you're a Democrat.

I have a sign up saying "property protected by any means necessary". several of them, actually. if someone doesn't see it, or ignores it, it is a full legal disclaimer. I have made the local sherrif's department aware of this, too. something my grandpa and dad taught me.

not really. at worst he's got to hit the firewall with a BFH to get room for it, and swap the hood, front crossmember, and outer radiator supports, then drop all the 4.0 stuff in. you guys make it sound like a big deal. it's sheet metal...easy as pie, spot welds are simple.

no, you don't. but good luck finding a 2wd ax15..

that's not a real vehicle. photoshop.

the only bolt in substitute is an ax15. there's not even a bellhousing to make the ax5 work with a 4.0. if you swap in an ax15 from an '89 to '92, it is a bolt-in setup, requiring only that you swap to an ax15 crossmember...you will need a 23 spline transfercase to go to ax15.

now... GET SOME PICS UP! :D