jpnjim Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 I know they didn't make a 93' MJ. :( But they were atleast planning to at some point, and put the info into the factory 1993 Data Book. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geonovast Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 Yeah... then instead, they made the ZJ.. :nuts: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpnjim Posted February 17, 2010 Author Share Posted February 17, 2010 I have bigger scans of this stuff if you guys can't read it. Here's their MJ customer base for 1993: 36 years old, Male and Married. $42k a year (17 years ago) 28% college grads (the LOWEST of ALL Jeeps BTW :rotf: ) If the line returned for 93' it was going to be down to just 'Eliminator', or 'Base' (tho there was an optional 'Sport' package on top of the Base model). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dunl Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 That's very cool. 8) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ComancheKid45 Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 this is completly irrelivent but that Eliminator picture reminded me of The 1 that was for sale last summer around here. It was sold to a Canadian Fella for the full asking price of $5500. In a way It would have been cool to see the MJs run into the mid 90s but I'm glad theyre as far and few between as they are....i mean look what happened 2 the Rangers and S-10s...lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geonovast Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 Can you get ahold of those books for all the years? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpnjim Posted February 17, 2010 Author Share Posted February 17, 2010 Yeah... then instead, they made the ZJ.. :nuts: Honestly, introducing the ZJ best move Jeep ever made, up till that time. The ZJ broke all kinds of Jeep sales records, and had a huge profit margin. I think the MJ went mostly because single cab pickups have one of the lowest profit margins, and they were never going to spend the money to make the Comanche an extended cab, or a (gasp) 4 door. (would've been sweet tho) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpnjim Posted February 17, 2010 Author Share Posted February 17, 2010 Can you get ahold of those books for all the years? They made them for every year, tho the AMC stuff is a little more scarce. (one area Chrysler was a big improvement in was their literature :thumbsup: ). I have alot of different ones. None are for sale, but I'll scan stuff if you're looking for something in particular. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpnjim Posted February 17, 2010 Author Share Posted February 17, 2010 I wonder if any of the 'New For 1993' colors were used in 92' MJ's (that would make for a rarity I'd think :smart: ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpnjim Posted February 17, 2010 Author Share Posted February 17, 2010 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpnjim Posted February 17, 2010 Author Share Posted February 17, 2010 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpnjim Posted February 17, 2010 Author Share Posted February 17, 2010 They were still going t keep the Big Ton option: Interiors: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpnjim Posted February 17, 2010 Author Share Posted February 17, 2010 And the color chart for 1993 Comanche's, these are the supposed 5 new colors: Deep Blue Metallic Navajo Turquoise Metallc Flame Red Canyon Blue Metallic and Light Champagne Metallic: The things that interest me the most about '1993 Comanche's' are, do the interior lights seem different to anyone else? (there's no mention of them working as a rocker switch in the text) these exterior colors and 'Two New Interior Colors'? (Charcoal & Dark Sand) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Backroads Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 Awesome post. I already put together my 'build' list, now to just go back in time and order the thing! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
valis Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 haha I love how even Chrysler refers to the armrests as 'hockey stick style.' I thought that was something Jeep owners made up ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HOrnbrod Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 Great info Jim - thanks for posting it. Observations: 1. Never knew the 4.0 HO engine was called "Powertech". That rings a bell for some other manufacturer's engines - can't think of it now. Oh, just remembered - it's FORD! :nuts: 2. The 93 B-pillar lamps look exactly like the Porsche/VW lamps I used. Maybe the Renault crap lights dried up? 3. The 93 "Base" model has a swoosh side decal just like the dealer installed one I have on my "Base" 91. Interesting stuff. :cheers: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gjeep Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 Not sure if any of you have ever noticed, but the factory parts manuals also list 93 MJ specific parts as well. For example, here's a listing of the interior dashboard wiring harnesses for MJ's only for the HO years. 5601 6869 MJ 1991 5601 7509 MJ 1992 5601 9161 MJ 1993 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HOrnbrod Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 Nope - I never noticed G. Just looked it up, and the 93 MJ harness is there. Any other examples? Lots of luck ordering 93 MJ parts. Were they ever produced and/or available? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AutoMoto Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 SORRY, I'm a noob.... Why didn't they produce a '93? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ComancheKid45 Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 Chrysler decided the Dakota had the brightest future and didnt want competition from the same cooperation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now