Jump to content

Dakota pump and sending unit.


Recommended Posts

I've done some searching with no luck. I have the 22 gallon dodge Dakota tank in my 87/98 Comanche. I am also using the Dakota pump and sending unit. Has anyone here figured out how to get the Dakota sending unit to talk to the Cherokee computer? or is there another pump/sending unit that will work in the Dakota tank that will talk to the Cherokee computer? My Comanche is about to hit the road here soon and I am wanting the gas gauge to work when that day comes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fuel sending unit doesn't communicate with the computer. It sends a varying voltage based on the position of the float directly to the fuel gauge. The voltage polarity also has to be the same as the Jeep fuel gauge so the gauge indicates correctly. Do you know what the resistance of the potentiometer on the Dakota sender is from empty to full? Easy enough to check with an ohmmeter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, HOrnbrod said:

The fuel sending unit doesn't communicate with the computer. It sends a varying voltage based on the position of the float directly to the fuel gauge. The voltage polarity also has to be the same as the Jeep fuel gauge so the gauge indicates correctly. Do you know what the resistance of the potentiometer on the Dakota sender is from empty to full? Easy enough to check with an ohmmeter. 

 

It should be a 220-20 ohm sender with 220 being empty and 20 being full.  Stupid Chrysler standard.  And being a stupid standard is the issue, as all Chrysler basket style pump/sender assemblies use that resistance range.

 

You could probably send it to a rebuilder and have them put a different potentionmeter in it, or do it yourself.  Otherwise you're stuck getting an aftermarket gauge, or going to the new style cluster, or you could possibly find a boat style capacitance sending unit that would produce a suitable output like the GM standard (0-99ohms) which would work reasonably well with a Renix gauge.  Boat style ones install pretty easily in a plastic tank.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here are the wiring diagrams for the XJ plug (top picture) and the Dakota pump plug (bottom picture).   Just cut and splice or make an adapter so you can retain the plugs for easy removal.  No need to change the gauge or reprogram anything, it's plug and play. 

FuelPumpModuleConnector_3.jpg.ac25719fcfc75f626a9a16b028280e38.jpg.2d4c61e46eabac97b42a270123571d1d.jpg

2010-02-07_164326_pump_c-xzdqsnxqopp4bp2buzm401cf-1-0.gif.b3797d27f2f3e7cf40193e03d7ace907.gif.1eb88549f83a8026ac4e10d78c8254af.gif

I made an adapter with a Mopar harness pigtail designed for a Dakota and an XJ fuel pump wire pigtail I cut off a spare XJ pump. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Dzimm said:

Also as an FYI, these adapters on ebay have the correct plugs on each end but the wires go to the wrong pins.  You can always buy one of these and cut the wires in the middle and reattach in the correct spots.

 

No need to cut and splice. Use the correct pin extractor tool to rearrange the pins in the connector(s).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DirtyComanche said:

Alright.

 

I stand by my comment that the Chrysler sending unit resistance range is stupid.  Disregard everything else.

 

Disregarded. It's only a stupid resistance range if you are a Mopar hater, which you obviously are. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, HOrnbrod said:

 

Disregarded. It's only a stupid resistance range if you are a Mopar hater, which you obviously are. 

 

It's stupid because they changed it.  Multiple times.  It's only that standard once they went to plastic tanks with basket pump/senders.

 

GM is the only one that really makes sense.  0-99 (100 effectively) ohms.  With 0 being 0.  That's like the metric system!  Ah, well, 'Mericans would hate that, way too logical.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DirtyComanche said:

It's stupid because they changed it.  Multiple times.  It's only that standard once they went to plastic tanks with basket pump/senders.

 

GM is the only one that really makes sense.  0-99 (100 effectively) ohms.  With 0 being 0.  That's like the metric system!  Ah, well, 'Mericans would hate that, way too logical.

 

Ah, well, now you're bashing the USA too.   :laugh:  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So what y’all are saying is that once Chrysler went to the plastic tank and basket sender pump unit the resistance was the same? Therefore the Jeep 97+ plastic tank and unit and the plastic tank and unit from the Dakota tank should work hand in hand? If that’s true then I either may have something hooked up wrong or a band sending unit in the first place.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Rockdrummer93 said:

So what y’all are saying is that once Chrysler went to the plastic tank and basket sender pump unit the resistance was the same? Therefore the Jeep 97+ plastic tank and unit and the plastic tank and unit from the Dakota tank should work hand in hand? If that’s true then I either may have something hooked up wrong or a band sending unit in the first place.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Correct.  The sending units operate the same way (at least I've yet to come across a Dakota unit that was different, what year is yours?).  If you correct where each wires go using the diagrams above, it should work.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...