Jump to content

87 Long Bed 4Wd Conversion


Recommended Posts

1. The rear drive shaft will not work its too short.

2. The front drive shaft may not work because of the difference in transmission length. 5speed vs automatic.

3. The tcase will not bolt onto your 2wd transmission without modifications. You need a 4wd 5 speed transmission.

4. The speedometer drive on the 2000 is electronic your 88 is mechanical.

5. The shift linkage needs to match your transmission as well. Parts of the shifter mount to the side of the transmission.

 

The 2000 may not be the best donor vehicle. If it was a 5 speed and you could get the transmission too then it would help. Also the front axle on the 2000 is a low pinion, it will work but its not the most desirable.

 

I'm sure others will chime in with more info.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you are going to do it go all in and change everything...Motor tranny t-case Computer harness...might be less hassle in the end

 

I have both Trucks you do (as well as some more) The motor in that 2000 is the best 4 liter made...off the shelf 25 hp more that your 87 (with potential for more)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you are going to do it go all in and change everything...Motor tranny t-case Computer harness...might be less hassle in the end

 

I have both Trucks you do (as well as some more) The motor in that 2000 is the best 4 liter made...off the shelf 25 hp more that your 87 (with potential for more)

 

I am curious to know what you are basing those figures off of? I am assuming that year must have come with both the better head (7120?) and the octopus intake, correct? Other than that what was done to improve performance? :hmm:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My info has the 87 @ 170 and the 2000/2001 @ 195

 

My right foot and backside can tell you that there is a very noticeable difference going from my 88 2 door Laredo 4l XJ to my (wife's) 2000......You can even notice the difference from my 1998 4l XJ to the 2000.

 

The only enjoyment I ever get out of driving the wife's XJ ( because it is Sienna pearl in color and has flowers hanging from the rear view mirror.....and she won't let me lift it) is the look on the faces of the tuners and 5 liter mustangs ....when I leave them at the stop light.

 

Just for  some good reading look at the car and driver article

(****** I will preface this to all the Keyboard warriors.....I did not write it ....just posted it****)

 

Makes me want to run from the cops.. . :MJ 1: .

 

When the 4.0 burst onto the scene, it had a full 180 horsepower in the Wrangler (a German publication listed it as 172 horsepower, and, in the Cherokee, it started out with 170 hp). One of its advantages was being designed for fuel injection: it had no mechanical fuel pump and was intended from the start to be injected, developed with help from Renault’s fuel injection techs (it used the Renault-Bendix, or Renix, system from 1987 to 1990)

 

In 1990, when the 4.0 still had 177 hp, the GM 4.3L V6 only made 160 hp, the Ford 4.9L I6 (used in the F150 and Econoline) only made 145 hp, the Ford 4.0 V6 made 155 hp, the Chrysler 5.2L made 170 hp, the Jeep/AMC 2bbl 360 V8 made 144 hp, and the Nissan 3.0 V6 (used in the Pathfinder) made 153 hp.

 

Jeep upped the ante in 1991, when the Cherokee's version made 190 hp.

 

In 1987 I wondered why they didn't drop the 4.0 I6 into the YJ, which was still using the 112-117 hp 258 (4.2 liter) six; or the Eagle, Concord and Grand Wagoneer, which came with the four-barrel 360 V8, making just 144 hp. The 4.0 made more power than the Ford 302 V8, Chevy 305, Chrysler 318, and AMC 360, as well as any of the six cylinder engines the Japanese were putting in their trucks, and it had comparable or better fuel economy.

 

An AMC Concord with the 177 hp 4.0 I6 might have been a better police pursuit vehicle than the Dodge Diplomats (140-150HP), Chevy Caprices (160-170HP) and Ford Crown Victorias (160-165HP). Compared with other contemporary engines, the 4.0 was strong up until the end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm guess I'm just looking for the easiest bolt on application with as little modification as possible. The only reason I suggested the 2000xj is cause the parts are free. The motor on it has a blown head. And for the gears I have a buddy with 4:10s for me

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then you would be better off finding something closer in years (87-90 ?)

 

And just to clear up a point made above....you can't modify a 2 wheel drive trans to bolt up to a t-case....you will need a 4wd one

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you take the trans t-case and front axle off the same vehicle (XJ?) then take the front drive shaft and linkage as well.... all will bolt up. You will have to have a rear drive shaft shortened and re-balanced.

 

My tip would be leave the rear drive shaft for the very end....not only will it be easier to measure to get it right.....but if everything else is installed you can put it in 4x4 and drive around in front wheel drive ( you might have to put a plastic cap on the t-case output to keep fluid from running out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...