Jump to content

Dakota 8.25


Recommended Posts

The short answer is YES a early (87-91) first Gen Dakota rear axle is almost a direct bolt in for a MJ/XJ, But there are a few differences. First, similarities, same dimensions spring perch to spring perch, backing plate to backing plate and drum to drum. Same 5 on 4 1/2" bolt pattern. Same 27 spline axles. Now the differences (mostly good), larger U joint and yoke, larger brakes, lots of 2 WD Dakotas came with Limited Slip. 4WD Dakotas, spring over, 2WD spring under. Dakota shock mounts welded to axle tube.

 

We own 2 XJ's and 2 first gen Dakotas, a 87 and a 92 and have been comparing parts between them for quite a while.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the Dakota axle matches the XJ perch separation distance? MJs are a different spacing than XJs.

 

 

Same spacing, the only real difference between XJ and MJ rears is the MJ's are spring under and the way the shocks mount on the axle side.

 

There are a few other parts that are direct interchange between Dakota and MJ too. Tail lights, rear bumpers, trailer hitches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the Dakota axle matches the XJ perch separation distance? MJs are a different spacing than XJs.

 

 

Same spacing, the only real difference between XJ and MJ rears is the MJ's are spring under and the way the shocks mount on the axle side.

 

Not exactly true .... in addition to the MJ being SUA and the XJ being SOA, the spacing between spring perches are different on the XJ and MJ. I'm pretty sure that MJ perches are wider than XJ. For example, an XJ rear would not just bolt in as an SOA for an MJ. You would have to move the perches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...