HOrnbrod Posted April 23, 2011 Posted April 23, 2011 http://www.usedcars.com/vehicledetail.aspx?vehicleId=36677902&refid=29397&detid=11000
HOrnbrod Posted April 23, 2011 Author Posted April 23, 2011 Me too. :cheers: It just looks "right". Dual stacks would be nice too.
turboxr Posted April 23, 2011 Posted April 23, 2011 Down the road from me. If anyone wants me to take a look at it, let me know.
xjrev10 Posted April 23, 2011 Posted April 23, 2011 Me too. :cheers: It just looks "right". Dual stacks would be nice too. ONLY if it had a small diesel so you could ROLL SOME COAL!!
codymanche Posted April 23, 2011 Posted April 23, 2011 the 2.1 diesel was an option for the comanche in 86 that would be sick
Automan2164 Posted April 23, 2011 Posted April 23, 2011 the 2.1 diesel was an option for the comanche in 86 that would be sick If by sick you mean Anemic, then yes. That would have been sick. While cool, rare, and different, the Diesel was underpowered (85ish Horsepower) and expensive to repair. Good mileage, but thats about it. Rob :D
kyleag89 Posted April 23, 2011 Posted April 23, 2011 Nice flatbed too bad its soo heavy you can't put too much more weight on it.
Incommando Posted April 24, 2011 Posted April 24, 2011 Some 7-leaf waggy springs and one of those lil' dually conversions and.... :wrench:
xjrev10 Posted April 25, 2011 Posted April 25, 2011 Some 7-leaf waggy springs and one of those lil' dually conversions and.... :wrench: and a GN hitch :rotf:
Car RamRod Posted April 27, 2011 Posted April 27, 2011 that is sharp looking, but I'd be afraid to really load it. Especially foward of the rear end.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now