Torker 2 Intake Part #?

[Craft86MJ]

Does anyone know the Part number to the Edelbrock Torker 2 intake manifold for the 2.8 60 degree v6 I've looked everywhere but all I can find is the Edelbrock performer OEM replacement intake manifold.

 

Thanks

[MrFreeze5]

Does anyone know the Part number to the Edelbrock Torker 2 intake manifold for the 2.8 60 degree v6 I've looked everywhere but all I can find is the Edelbrock performer OEM replacement intake manifold.

 

Thanks

 

I was cleaning out my basement last week and I found an edelbrock catalog from 1999. I know for a fact its in that book since I had a 2.8l Blazer at that time. I MIGHT have thrown it out though with everything else, but Ill check tonight.

[Craft86MJ]

So I was at the track the other day when I saw an S10 with a 2.8 in it I talked to the guy and he told me that the Torker II and Performer intakes were the same part, Is their any truth behind this?

[86FUBAR]

As far as i know there is only 1 intake and you can get and 2 different tops , one for the stock 2v carb and the other for a 4v carb.

I got the edelbrock with the 2v setup and like it alot i can post the numbers when i get home to night .

here is my build thread , there are some pics in there of the setup (page 3 i think) and ill post more detail later

viewtopic.php?f=7&t=5484

[Craft86MJ]

These are the only ones I found for the 2.8

 

Their listed as Performer series

Edelbrock Base Intake Part Number 3785

Edelbrock top manifold for 4B/4V carb 3789

 

as I was searching for them I ran across a camaro forum that they stated that they had Torker II's on their 2.8's. They might be the same part IDK

[MrFreeze5]

Hey, looks like the old catalog got thrown out with all the other junk, but it looks like someone else had the answer. And if I remember correctly, there is only one manifold for the 2.8 as was mentioned. It should be the same part for S10/Blazers, Camaros, Comanches, Cherokees, etc.

[Craft86MJ]

So I'm assuming a performer intake is referred to as a Torker II then.

[Pete M]

I'm assuming this will also fit the 3.4/3.1L?

[Craft86MJ]

So does that mean that I can put 3.1/3.4 heads on my 2.8 wit the intake? Or does the whole Iron heads and aluminum heads run an issue?

[Pete M]

I wouldn't use a 2.8 block. much too prone to catastrophic explosions. :yes:

[86FUBAR]

I'm not sure if u could run 3.1-3.4 heads on a 2.8 , i did for a wile run later large valve heads off of a 88 or 89 s10 but also switched to some larger tires etc.. at the same time so i was unable to give it the but dyno but I'm sure it didnt hurt. the one thing u have to do the edelbrock manifold is gasket match the 2 pieces because the fit was horible , that and i had to ditch the partial stud kit that came with the manifold due to some leaks that developed :fs1: but other than that i like it . next i want to get the headers for it and some roller rockers but for now that can wait

[JeepcoMJ]

Just throw in a 3.4 from an early 90's camaro with the wiring and all. It's easy, and u just have to put a 4.0 sender in the tank with pump, swap the 2.8 exhaust manifold and oil pan on, and you're good to go. Instant reliable power increase.