Pseudosport Posted August 19, 2013 Share Posted August 19, 2013 I’m planning on swapping a 1999 dash, cluster, and harness into my Comanche and have a few questions. I have the entire uncut interior harness from the 99 but not the engine harness. Can I use any engine harness from 1997-2001? My truck currently has a manual transmission. If I use the harness from an automatic XJ will I have any problems with the computer throwing codes or do I just use a computer from a manual with any harness? Can I use my stock fuel tank and pump till I find a Dakota tank? I’m ok with the dash gauge not working for now. I realize I’ll need to splice a bunch of wires for interior lights, fuel pump, NSS, etc. I just want to make sure I start with the correct harness. I’d like to find the engine harness from another 1999 but if any work that just makes my search easier. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Akula69 Posted August 19, 2013 Share Posted August 19, 2013 Alexia had it right - I was unaware of the difference between the 1999 and the 200-01 harnesses Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alexia Posted August 19, 2013 Share Posted August 19, 2013 1.) 1999 engine harness is 1999 only. A 2000 to 2001 engine harness will work with a 1999 interior harness, but you will need a 2000+ PCM to control the coil pack rail since 1999 is still a distributor ignition. 1999+ wiring harnesses are all fairly standardized for optional features, but specific about certain ones such as Federal/California emissions. 2.) Yes, just use a manual transmission PCM. Of course there will be some unused connectors. I believe you may have to do a couple items such as wiring in the neutral safety switch. 3.) If you mean a stock MJ fuel pump, absolutely not. It does not put out the required 49 PSI for the 1997+ fuel system. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pseudosport Posted August 19, 2013 Author Share Posted August 19, 2013 1. Forgot about the coil packs after 99. That would make things a little different. 2. I'm ok with the extra connectors. That would at least give me the option of swaping in an automatic later on. (bad knees but I like the manual) 3. Hmm, I could crush the regulator to reach 49 PSI. That would at lease let me test everything and move the Jeep around the yard if needed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alexia Posted August 19, 2013 Share Posted August 19, 2013 3. Hmm, I could crush the regulator to reach 49 PSI. That would at lease let me test everything and move the Jeep around the yard if needed.The MJ fuel system is a constant circulating system with the pressure regulator at the rail. The fuel rail for the 1997+ is returnless with the regulator built into the pump. The MJ fuel pump would simply continue to pressurize the system until it blows a hose off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pseudosport Posted August 19, 2013 Author Share Posted August 19, 2013 I'd be using an older fuel rail with the built in regulator and return line. It's not the best idea but its something I could make work in a few minutes with some spare parts. I hope to gether all the stuff needed for the Dakota swap since that looks like my best option but I like having a backup plan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now