wallisek Posted May 15, 2009 Share Posted May 15, 2009 So my new piston rings came in the mail yesterday and I installed them correctly onto the old pistons. The pistons were cleaned up and de-gunked prior to installation. Without rings, the pistons move very freely within the cylinder walls. After putting the new rings on I'll be damned if I could get the pistons to move at all. They are oriented correctly and in their respective order. I removed them, tried again with lots of lube and oil and they still don't move. With a ring compressor and deadblow hammer they fit right in but soon as they reach TDC, they don't want to move at all. What the hell is going on? I doubled check the boxed set that came, Hastings part # 665. :wall: With new rings I expect a tighter seal but this is ridiculous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWLONGSHOT Posted May 15, 2009 Share Posted May 15, 2009 The rings need to be checked for OAL and adjusted for each application. IIRC you cannot open the pkg, install on piston and slide it in the bore... They need to be filed for proper clearance. CW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wallisek Posted May 15, 2009 Author Share Posted May 15, 2009 I read that part in the manual where is tells you to check for ring gap. The instrutions that came with the pistons were fairly general and said some applications require the rings to be filed. Anyways I went back to the garage with my instructions and caliper. Both the old and new rings have the same exact gap when installed so no problem there. The instructions state: "No portion of the inside diameter should protrude b eyond the piston land." This statement is true for the old rings however NOT for the new ones. The width of the old rings is 4.4mm while the new ones are 4.6mm and protrude noticably past the land. So my guess is maybe the manufacter boxed the wrong size rings? This would make sense why the pistons have such a hard time moving is because the rings are too big. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joop Posted May 15, 2009 Share Posted May 15, 2009 Have you rebored and honed the cylinders? If not it could be that the new rings get stuck when they reach the ridges in the cylinder made by the old rings at TDC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geonovast Posted May 15, 2009 Share Posted May 15, 2009 Have you rebored and honed the cylinders? If not it could be that the new rings get stuck when they reach the ridges in the cylinder made by the old rings at TDC. If anything the top of the cylinder wall would be a minutely smaller diameter, so the piston would actually free up when it got past the top. It's gotta be the wrong rings. 4.4 vs. 4.6 is a big difference when you're talking about clearances that get measured down to the 0.001". 0.2mm is ~0.0078" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wallisek Posted May 16, 2009 Author Share Posted May 16, 2009 The ridges were removed so no hang up there. Only thing I can think of is the manufactuer boxed the wrong rings, maybe they are oversized who knows. Soon as I start my new job I may say "to hell with it" and just do a 4.0 swap. I have 3.55's and a 5spd so that would accomodate a 4.0 better I suppose. Guess I'll move onto interior work in the meantime. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geonovast Posted May 16, 2009 Share Posted May 16, 2009 Soon as I start my new job I may say "to hell with it" and just do a 4.0 swap. I have 3.55's and a 5spd so that would accomodate a 4.0 better I suppose. Guess I'll move onto interior work in the meantime. Keep in mind that you will need a new transmission for a 4.0 swap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wallisek Posted May 16, 2009 Author Share Posted May 16, 2009 Yeah, would need a new bellhousing among other things. AX-15 would be a better than the AX-5, plus I wouldn't need to screw around with that stupid internal clutch setup. Dang jeeps lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geonovast Posted May 16, 2009 Share Posted May 16, 2009 Yeah, would need a new bellhousing among other things. Dang jeeps lol Well yes. Because you need a different transmission. The AX-5 WILL NOT bolt up the 4.0. There is no bellhousing for it, and if it did, the transmission would detonate. You will need either a BA 10/5 or AX-15. But don't get the BA 10/5. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FxRacing282 Posted May 16, 2009 Share Posted May 16, 2009 the cylinders needs to be honed because engine is more than just wearing down the bore and rings. the top of the cylinder is has a larger bore than the bottom and the cylinder become oval shaped as it heats up and expands against itself. send it to a machine shop to get checked and re-bored or just honed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brdhntr Posted May 16, 2009 Share Posted May 16, 2009 :agree: needs to be honed or rebored. even if you have the wrong rings, it's best to rebore or hone when doing the job. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wallisek Posted May 16, 2009 Author Share Posted May 16, 2009 Well soon as funds permit, I'll either do a swap or just send everything to the shop and do a complete rebuild. Either way I was going to need to send the head in to be checked, I didn't like the color of a few of the valves. I suspect possible cracks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now