JpEditor

that is funny, good stuff. and thanks. but i might let my subscription end in june since this site has been way more help then Jp. all of us here are on the same level and help everyone out who wants to make their own stuff rather then fork over money for something. they have helped me out with a few things but not enough to keep it coming and just read articles on what their thoughts are about the rigs that they feature. i mean someone else asked what they should do with their 86 with the 2.8 once and they told him to sell it and find a better one since there were no other options. they might have mentioned the 3.4L swap but they forgot to tell the guy that he could have the later yeared 86 that can fit the 4.0 without any real mods. and they said that the 3.4 swap would be too hard or something when it is a straight bolt-in. also not too long ago did you see that they said the 4.0 was from the CDX 2.5L? when we all know the 4.0 is an AMC engine from the 2.5 they used. CDX had nothing to do with either of those engines. i figured i would spice this up a bit since i bet this gets put in next months mailbox area. :popcorn: Alex Really? Wow. You kind of got part of it right. You forgot to mention the French tranny that's garbage and the fact that buying a used Comanche with the engine the guy wanted would be less expensive than making a swap like that. Yes, the 2.5 was the basis for much of the 4.0. It came out first. So how do you explain them using the same internals (rockers for example). Again, straight from the mouths at Jeep.

hey now I'm only 19 but i know more then i have ever seen written in Jp mag. seems like they have gone downhill. i mean the whole bree stuff and it also seems like they have been doing stuff that they find cool instead of doing stuff that jeepers want to know. also they must think everyone has money because they almost never do homemade stuff but rely on kits and custom made stuff from high dollar places. just my . Alex Yep, we goofed. Just like a few of you we didn't catch it either. Sorry 'bout that guys. I’m embarrassed. We make mistakes all the time...just like everyone else in the world. Thanks for understanding. I noticed some of you disagree with the information printed. The majority of it came directly from Jeep, as did the images. I hope there was at least some bit of info about the MJ in there that you maybe did not know. That’s what we strive for. I could sit and argue all day over unfounded negative comments about the magazine and it's staff but where would that really get me. Let's look at the big picture here. We actually have an MJ owner on staff (Pete). No other off-road magazine does. We have done several stories that included the truck. We have several more planned. No other magazine even covers MJs. If the MJ owners that read Jp hate the magazine, its staff, and what we do why would we even bother running more stories on the MJ? Positive reinforcement is much more constructive than comments like this. Thanks for your time, John Cappa, Editor, Jp Magazine